Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-08-2012, 01:50 PM
MarkoD's Avatar
MarkoD MarkoD is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,904
MarkoD is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paddyob View Post
How do you know how long this person has been in fish keeping.

I guess I won't offer advice.
lol dont you know? online post counts are obviously an accurate representation of how much experience you have
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-08-2012, 01:56 PM
fishytime's Avatar
fishytime fishytime is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: E-town
Posts: 5,390
fishytime will become famous soon enough
Default

I use both.....my check valve is on a union and I have two.....I swap them out very so often for cleaning....
__________________
260g mixed reef, 105g sump, water blaster 7000 return, Bubble King SM 300 skimmer, Aqua Controller Jr, 4 radions, 3 Tunze 6055s,1 tunze 6065, 2 Vortech MP40s, Vortech MP20, Tunze ATO, GHL SA2 doser, 2 TLF reactors (1 carbon, 1 rowa). http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=50034 . Tank Video here http://www.vimeo.com/2304609 and here http://www.vimeo.com/16591694
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2012, 09:08 PM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

Wow, I should have checked in yesterday

Quote:
Originally Posted by paddyob View Post
How do you know how long this person has been in fish keeping.

I guess I won't offer advice.
All I meant was ensquire gave no reference as to how long the loc-line had been in use.
My reply wasn't meant to imply anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-09-2012, 09:33 PM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

I'd like to thank Everyone for their input. I never imagined I'd get this much feedback.

With the limited # of responses to using a check valve, and the thoughts on it fouling etc, that option is off the table.

I am attempting to get some surface flow from the loc-lines. Because of the way I currently have them, there is the chance they can be bumped quite low below the surface, allowing way too much volume to back siphon. I will have to re-think the routing.
This is how they sit and now you see why I originally posted these questions.



I agree whole-heartedly with the idea of laying out the lines so no valve or anti-siphon holes are required.
I'll have to attempt to shorten the lines and it looks like I'll lose the surface flow I was looking for.

Last edited by gregzz4; 04-09-2012 at 09:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2012, 05:23 AM
ensquire's Avatar
ensquire ensquire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Yellowknife
Posts: 669
ensquire is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregzz4 View Post
Wow, I should have checked in yesterday



All I meant was ensquire gave no reference as to how long the loc-line had been in use.
My reply wasn't meant to imply anything else.
Thanks for clarifying that
I used a Y like you did here, but used the flare end thinking that it was less likely to get pushed too deep.
Drilling a couple of holes for back up is never a bad idea, and as you said, the drilled segments can be replaced .
Things are looking very clean, very well set up system.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-08-2012, 09:59 PM
ensquire's Avatar
ensquire ensquire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Yellowknife
Posts: 669
ensquire is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregzz4 View Post
No offence, but you're not giving me a long-time user experience with your reply.
I'm looking for user responses with long-time experience.
My apologies for my unknowing opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-08-2012, 03:49 PM
outacontrol outacontrol is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Stony Plain
Posts: 230
outacontrol is on a distinguished road
Default

I did all of the above, I drilled a small hole in my return line, I installed a george fisher check valve, and my sump has enough capacity to hold the back flow, if the check valve fails and the anti-siphon hole gets plugged.
Why only have one safety in place when I can have multiple.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2012, 12:46 AM
paddyob's Avatar
paddyob paddyob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,481
paddyob is on a distinguished road
Default

I use both.

Check valves work great, but over time the seals dry due to the salt in our tanks.

I shut my return pump off for target feeding so I get to check them regularily to ensure function.

I replaced them recently... once in 1.5 years.

The siphon holes are back up as in extra space in the sump. You can't be too careful.
__________________


My 70 Gallon build:

http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=66478


My Mandarin Paradise:

http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=72762



I wonder... does anyone care enough to read signatures if you make them really small? I would not. I would probably moan and complain, read three words and swear once or twice. But since you made it this far, please rate my builds.

Last edited by paddyob; 04-10-2012 at 12:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-10-2012, 01:23 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by paddyob View Post
Check valves work great, but over time the seals dry due to the salt in our tanks.
Thanks, that's what I suspected
I'll try my latest configuration and am still contemplating drilled holes, but only as a backup.
I have a lifetime subscription to Back-up magazine but am also trying to go with the KISS method.
Because I haven't tested my system yet with salt, I have no idea what kind of micro bubbles I may end up with due to my current config. This is why I'm leaning towards no holes.
All I can do is try it and worst case I replace the drilled pieces, right?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-10-2012, 04:52 PM
paddyob's Avatar
paddyob paddyob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 2,481
paddyob is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregzz4 View Post
Thanks, that's what I suspected
I'll try my latest configuration and am still contemplating drilled holes, but only as a backup.
I have a lifetime subscription to Back-up magazine but am also trying to go with the KISS method.
Because I haven't tested my system yet with salt, I have no idea what kind of micro bubbles I may end up with due to my current config. This is why I'm leaning towards no holes.
All I can do is try it and worst case I replace the drilled pieces, right?


Holes on the end of your output will lose micro bubbles the same as the siphon holes.

Micro bubbles are a sump set up issue. Not siphon holes. Keep your skimmer in a chamber or two back from your return pump to "eliminate" them.
__________________


My 70 Gallon build:

http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=66478


My Mandarin Paradise:

http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=72762



I wonder... does anyone care enough to read signatures if you make them really small? I would not. I would probably moan and complain, read three words and swear once or twice. But since you made it this far, please rate my builds.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.