Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Other > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2010, 10:45 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
The house next door is actually still owned by Douglas Homes which my Realtor just happens to work for so it might be pretty easy to get permission.
If both properties are still owned by the developer being sold by douglas then ask them to resurvay the ajoining property line 3" over as the house is not sellable as is.

if they are still in that phase the 300.00 buck survay cost is probably no problem for the developer/agents to adsorb.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2010, 07:48 PM
darb darb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 131
darb is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
No the other house has lots of extra space. Currently the other house is 1.85m where my house is 1.15m. So if possible one could reduce the other house to 1.80m and increase mine to 1.2m. This way both houses would be in spec since the limit is 1.2m and I can't see how someone would miss 5cm from their side yard, it's not even noticeable.
That would work well in your favour for a variance application. It may be your best bet to invest in a consultant (lawyer?) to put together a solid application since the combined total space between structures exceeds the minimum requirements and thus there is no increased risk due the the 5 cm encroachment by your house. Logically .....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2010, 08:18 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darb View Post
That would work well in your favour for a variance application. It may be your best bet to invest in a consultant (lawyer?) to put together a solid application since the combined total space between structures exceeds the minimum requirements and thus there is no increased risk due the the 5 cm encroachment by your house. Logically .....
Yes it would work well but I just spoke to my Realtor who informed me this isn't an option and hasn't heard of anyone doing this in the 20 years he's been in the business. However my trust in this particular Realtor is fading more everyday that goes by. I think I'll discuss this with my lawyer as apparently the banks (seller) lawyer has also stated that they have already perused every possible option available and the only thing to do is wait for the verdict from Wheatland which as far as I can tell will be a conditional variance based on removing the windows completely and possibly reinstalling special grade drywall on the entire right side of the house.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.