Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-10-2004, 12:44 AM
Acro Acro is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 495
Acro is on a distinguished road
Default

J&L has some
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-10-2004, 01:57 AM
EmilyB's Avatar
EmilyB EmilyB is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Scenic Acres NW Calgary
Posts: 4,253
EmilyB is on a distinguished road
Default

You have to use such a small amount of it, even in my 230g, that I don't really see the need for a reactor if you have any flow going thru it at all.

After 24 hrs - no need to clean the glass today. Strange. Cyano still there, but not as healthy for sure.

Fish and sessile inverts seemed starved and fed extremely voraciously tonite for some reason. All six cleaners fighting with the fish for a meaty dinner.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-10-2004, 04:25 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I can't remember if I had any cyano patches before I put it in, Deb. I don't see any right now. When I added it I was reading PO4 at about .25 and after a week it was down to about 0.1. Then I got impatient with testing PO4 and haven't tested since. I'm not running one of those reactors (they're upflow style) but I am running it with my carbon just in a 3" PVC pipe with some eggcrate on the bottom to hold it in and a wee powerhead to pipe water through it. When the water level overflows over the top I clean out the filter socks. I imagine the reactor or at least an upflow style cannister would be more effective, but I was happy with the moderate reduction I got out of it.

I did go and buy a reactor from Big Al's, and I was going to use it on the 72g, but, well, .... I guess it's less of rush issue now.

Incidentally it hasn't really helped with the odd patch of hair algae, I still have to pull that out manually about once a month.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-10-2004, 02:36 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

I have some pretty old base rock and some 15yr. old Florida rock. Seems as ongoing battle to keep algae from growing on it, despite high flow, bare bottom, 32in. beckett skimmer and ATS.

Mike Miles also had the same ongoing problem, in his 180 softy tank. I suggested, after all the reads on RC, that he try some Phosban. Remember he has been fighting with this algae for a year or more. After a couple of months of Phosban use, his algae problem seems to be gone. Is it directly related to the Phosban? Who knows? He did add some calerpa to his sump, which is helping, I assume so, but he was running my scrubber previous, when I had no large tank.

So I decided my tank would be a good test. No other changes were made. But before I ordered Phosban, Phil at Xenia North America {Giesemann Lighting}, asked me if I would try some Rowaphos in my tank. Good test situation we figured. It arrived a few days ago. I started out with half the suggested dose for now. Been only a couple days so far. I will make a full report once I see some results, positive or negative.
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.