![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Looks like the "UV" in those printers is just barely UVA at 395nm. Not the deep UV referred to above which is UVB at less than 315nm.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ^ Got it , thanks
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Ron is right! Even though MH pump out harmful UV the lights "should" have a UV glass on them.
I would not go near this! Another reason why LED's that are UV only go down to about 380-390 much of which if not all is filtered out by the shield. Its quite a myth that UV from aquarium lamps gets to the corals, the name UV came from T5 tubes where they adopted the term to market purple colour. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Pretty cool to have a UV sterilizer without having to change the bulbs or at least be effective for up to 10 years.
__________________
Though a tree grow ever so high, the falling leaves return to the root. 300DD - 140DD ![]() TOTM Fall 2013 |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Yeah, if you had one emitter over a dedicated section of your sump (but shielded from the skimmer) then you could eradicate parasites with this UV led emitter instead of having to hook up a reg. UV sterilizer.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yep agreed for sterilization this is a leap forward.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|