![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
View Poll Results: to skim or not to skim | |||
yes i use a skimmer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
78 | 83.87% |
no i do not use a skimmer |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 16.13% |
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I just wanted to revive this thread, rather than starting a new one. My 6 moth old RLSS 6I skimmer died, so I am skimmerless, not by choice, but by circumstance. I just wanted to know if there are any succesful SPS tanks out there that run skimmerless.
I run a mixed coral 3 ft cube (150 gallon in the DT), with a 30 gallon sump. The tank is plumbed in line with a 55 gal refugium that is full of cheato and rock. I probably have a toal of 80 lbs or more of rock between the DT and the fuge. The tank is predominantly SPS, but with a few LPS and some zoas and mushrooms. As far as my bioload, I have the following tank inhabitants: - 3 inch yelow tang, - 3 inch copperband butterfly, - 3 inch harlequin tusk, - 3.5 inch tamarin wrasse, - 3 inch reticulated anthia, - a pair of mated Percs (2 and 3 inches) - a 2 inch cleaner wrasse - a pair of skunk shrimp (2.5 iches) - a lonely peppermint shrimp (about an inch). Should I try to run it skimmerless or scramble to replace the skimmer? |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I have no answer...however, are you willing to risk the health and investment of your SPS's to find out? Something to think about. Good luck and keep us posted.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If i recall correctly, the consensus was: Yes, you can run a successful skimmerless SPS tank, so long as you remove/export nutrients yourself. This can be achieved by one or all of the following techniques:
1. Perform a 50% water change once a day. 2. reduce (or stop) feeding your fish. 3. Remove some (mostly all) of your fish. The equation for success is simple: S = NO > NI where: S = Success NO = Nutrients Out NI = Nutrients In |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1. Too much work, you want to enjoy not be a slave. 2. reduce= maybe (stop feeding) not in my tank! 3. why bother reefing you might as well shut down! Your equation to me = get yourself a good skimmer and enjoy the hobby or stop reefing and collect stamps instead. ![]()
__________________
Hey! I never "LEFT" the hobby, just doing fresh water now. Which is still listed as part of Canreef if I'm not mistaken. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I broke down and ordered a new controller for my skimmer pump, so it looks like I'll be skimmerless for just a week or so. But, while panicking about it I did some research, and there seems to be a lot of controversy out there. There are people who run successful reef tanks (including SPS dominated ones) without a skimmer, and swear by it. Most seem to do it once the tank is mature and packed with corals.
I also found this article which made me rethink the whole skimmer story: http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/2/aafeature |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|