![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I agree with mrhasan's statement, "a smaller tank, with proper maintenance, is much better than a big tank with no care."
I have a 28g Nano and a 54g Corner, and maintenance takes 15 minutes on the 28 and 2 hours on the 54. I have 1 Clown in the 54 and no fish in the 28. I will be putting a pair of Clowns in the 28 real soon. I also have a very efficient skimmer on the 54 (Tunze 9410) and an even better one on the 28 (Reef Octopus 1000). Gerry |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() A larger tank is much more stable.
__________________
180g reef w 90g sump 3 - EcoTech Radion XR30w G2, 2 - MP40w ES Vertex Alpha 250 & Puratek 100 RO/DI 3 - Fluval E300 heaters |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Wrong.
A larger tank is "easier" is to keep stable. It won't be stable automatically. Smaller tanks are just "harder" to keep stable. A properly cared small tank will be much more stable than a "i just need a bigger tank to keep it stable miraculously" big tank. Infact, I am pretty sure bigger tanks are prone to more crashes more than smaller tanks.
__________________
You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|