![]() |
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Thanks Steve, I've heard Photoshop is good for RAW, but I don't have Photoshop.
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I would choose adobe lightroom over the full version of photoshop. Lightroom has most of the "developing" capability that photoshop has (it's missing advanced photo-editing stuff) and has an incredibly powerful organisational feature.
Lightroom is also SIGNIFICANTLY cheaper than the full version of photoshop... you can try it free for a month if you download it through adobe's website. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Photoshop Elements also does RAW and can be found for under $100. Also has a free trial on the website.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|