![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If you ware using a calcium reactor how is it any different than natural seawater replacing minerals? The trace elements are in the media, since it is dead coral. If i was dosing i would be doing lots of water changes to reduce the "extra" elements you are adding with the 2 part mixes.
The way i see it is if you have a big enough balanced system(well cycled, 0 nitrates/phosphates) then all you're doing in a water change is taking out "live" water full of beneficial bacteria, and replacing it with "dead" water. Why don't we change live rock over time? In theory it should have the same degradation as the water and buildup of unwanted elements. I'm not wanting to full out say they're bad, lots of people do them, lots don't. Just putting forward something smarter lazy/cheap reefing. I've tried both ways, found that my tank stayed more balanced when i didn't do them.
__________________
My 150 In Wall Build |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() For one, it's cost prohibitive. Two, you have to dismantle your tank. but yes, you probably should change rock every 5 years or so, should you actully keep a tank going that long.
__________________
Brad |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Change 10 percent of your rock once per year. Set in stone. No debating pls.
__________________
Winning |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Now it seems to me most, if not all of your questions have been answered, but you don't acknowledge them. We've been debating, and providing rebuttals to your comments (and poking doodles) all day long.
__________________
Brad |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Yes, my question regarding if anybody else does it is answered. Which of course in NO. Why? Because that is what the've been taught by "beginners 101"....
__________________
Winning |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|