Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > DIY

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29  
Old 02-11-2004, 11:42 PM
ron101's Avatar
ron101 ron101 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 262
ron101 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Would you not theoretically gain a slight efficiency advantage with higher voltage (ie. less heat produced by the ballasts)?

Quote:
If there is something like that, my guess is it's minimal or negligible. Of all the stats/specs I read about ballasts, they all more or less have the same "wattage" (which is roughly amps times voltage, give or take) regardless of what input voltage is used.
Overall power draw on the circuit is voltage x amperage; which should remain the same for both a 110 and a 220v setup. However power lost to heat is [correction : resistance x current squared] so a 220v setup should have less than a 110v and thus the difference should make it to the lamp given a constant line resitance.

Anyways, consider it a proposed experiment for someone with a 220v hookup and a PAR meter .[/i]
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.