![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() if you have wrasses and sand-sifters I think it'll all get mixed up anyways, blown around and probably not deep enough to do what a dsb does.
Other than actual sand-fines I can stir my sand up and it's clean. So long as you have decent flow and a hard-working sifter I'd go shallow and pass on the sugar grains... just my opinion tho... i don't actually know anything =) |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If your going to have lots of flow in your tank don't go sugar sand. It's pain in the arse trying to get the flow just right.
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Deja-vu hahaha, a very similar question was just posted a couple days ago. Here's an abbreviated version of my previous reply; it depends....
![]() What livestock do you intend to keep? LPS and softies, SPS, sand-sifting animals.... Fish and flow willd determine the requirements of the sand-bend. For eg. I have a canary wrasse which requires atleast 2" of fine sand to burrow into each night. I have sugar sand in my tank which does get blown around, but I accept that limitation and know that my tank will probably never be a killer SPS tank because I have to limit the flow to prevent a sand-storm. As for the DSB problems, that shouldn't apply to a healthy DSB with the appropriate livestock slowly turning over the sand bed. Pods, worms, snails, and fishes turning over the upper surface should prevent any buildup of toxic gases. Nitrate buildup? Only time I heard of that was with people using crushed coral or very course gravel which collects detritus and allows nitrates to buildup. In order to get the benefits of a true DSB (oxygen deprived zone) you need fairly fine sand. So think about the livestock you want to keep, if fine sand doesn't jive in the DT, run a DSB in the refugium or an external DSB. If anything I'd say fuge / external is the safest place because it can be easily serviced if needed, then just put whatever suits your livestock and your taste (visually) in the DT. I'm relatively green at reefing, had a tank for just about 2 years, but I like you have done tons of reading on the matter. Good luck! |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I went with about 1.5" of sugar sand in my SPS tank. I've since replaced it with a little heavier grade. It still moves around to the point that the front 4" of my tank is bare bottom. I have wrasses that like the sand, so I keep it, and I also put egg crate down below the sand because I'm dumb sometimes. If it weren't for the egg crate, I'd remove it all and add a big container of sand behind the rock for the wrasses to sleep in. I do like the look of sand, and it stays clean, but I currently have a mix of shallow, deep, bare and egg crate bottom. Le sigh....
__________________
Brad |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Here's what made my final decision: there were critters I wanted to keep that needed a deep sand bed, so I went with one.
If there isn't anything that requires sand, try bare bottom for its benefits and see if you like the look. If you don't end up liking it, put some sand in at that point.
__________________
240 gallon tank build: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=110073 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
If you see it, can take care of it, better get it or put it on hold. Otherwise, it'll be gone & you'll regret it! |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Thanks everyone. I suppose this debate will never be truly "settled". I'll keep weighing the options and we'll see what happens. there is a very small fuge section in my sump (not big enough to have any impact on nutrient levels), so I might try one out in there and see what happens. If anything, I can always add more sand later...
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|