![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'll second that. As for what you have, thats not overskimming IMO. Kinda lets you overstock as per your fish requirements.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() So what's the problems with over skimming?, I've heard of it but untill now i've never bothered to ask
![]()
__________________
........ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think in general, you are better off to overskim and add trace elements if its a genuine concern for you...
You really cant overskim when it comes to waste removal, only in the removal of the trace elements and there are so may simple dosing options (including regular water changes)that I don't really think overskimming is a viable issue for most reefers. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I don't see how over-skimming is possible. Skimmers can only pull out so much, after that the skimmate doesn't make it to the collection cup and you just wind up aerating the water in the skimmer tower.
That report in Advanced Aquarist said that skimmers can only remove about 30% of DOC's anyways. Mitch |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I've always been under the impression that overskimming is a real hazard, trace elements are easily replaced but I would be concerned about the microscopic life that gets removed through the skimmer
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm no expert but I'd have thought that the microscopic elements would be the FIRST things to be stripped out by skimming and the heavier stuff stayed behind and would only be removed by excessive skimming....
__________________
-Mark 29 Gal Bowfront w/24" LED Lights. DIY HOB Sump (5.4 Gal) MP40. Orange Spotted Watchman Goby, 2 Clownfish and a few hermits. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I've never thought of the vertex as that low end. I've always been very happy with mine, especially at a third the price of the "high end" skimmer but that's another discussion...
Last edited by Slick Fork; 08-18-2010 at 02:56 AM. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() In the series that Ocean Aquatics posted they discuss this question in part 4 http://www.lafishguys.com/88-%20prot...skimmer-04.htm
__________________
"We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever." - H.P. Lovecraft Old 120gal Tank Journal New 225gal Tank Journal May 2010 TOTM The 10th Annual Prince George Reef Tank Tour |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Imo Vertex IN series would be comparable with EuroReef RS series in performance, but not build quality (where EuroReef RS takes the cake in this comparison). If only performance is taken into consideration, I would put both EuroReef RS and Vertex IN as mid-range quality. It is true you will pay a significantly higher price for a high-end skimmer. I have a EuroReef RS-180 on my 90, and although it does a good job I wouldn't go exclaiming its brilliance.
One thing many people don't consider when choosing a skimmer is the volume the manufacturer suggests for the skimmer is usually anything from a bit to a lot optimistic. The reefer's expectations also play a role in what the skimmer is capable of. For example, if someone is replacing their Remora with a Vertex IN he is going to think the Vertex is the cat's meow, but take someone who is replacing their Bubble King with a Vertex IN and he may be disappointed. In the end, it is all relative, but that's beyond the focus of your question (I think?), and in relation to the question I really don't think you have anything to worry about. On the other hand, in my experience, I have found that most LPS and softies do better with an under-performing skimmer or even skimmer-less setup. ![]() -------------------------- Read my post closer: Quote:
Last edited by Myka; 08-18-2010 at 04:26 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|