|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
05-10-2010, 05:00 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
So what skimmer would you advise for red sea max considering that a RSM is sumpless
__________________
    ~*~*Stefan*~*~ Formally known as Svaningen 35 gallon Red Sea Max Only 16 years old!!!!  CALL AFTER 3:00 ON WEEKDAYS. 604 782 3313 
|
|
#3
05-10-2010, 06:05 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Ken
|
|
#4
05-10-2010, 06:14 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Yep for 65 gallon the BMqq will really do well. it can really pull some cr*p this baby.
|
|
#5
05-28-2010, 01:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The RSM isnt sumpless ... just has a sump in the back and not like the traditional sump under the tank setup....
--cut from RSM Club-- The 70mm cylinder (2.76 inches) should fit the back but if you go look at the images, I think the additional space needed by their mounting bracket would make it a no-go in the back of a 130 or 130D. Looks like it would sit up pretty high also - no closed hood or at least no skimmer flap. --end cut-- Hope that helps ..
|
|
#6
05-28-2010, 03:27 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The BM-qq is definatly a interesting skimmer.
It is ingenious that they have the air intake tube through skimmercup, to work like an auto-shutoff when the cup is full, as well as a drain. No air no bubbles, no more skimmate. Only flaws I see so far are the footprint it takes up in a tank, and the narrowness of the clamps for the glass. It won't install without modification with tanks with a trim on them (hagen/marineland/etc), which are the standard you would use this skimmers on. Ken - BWA
|
|
#7
05-28-2010, 03:34 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The good news is the new NAC-QQ resolves all this.
I will be talking to BM to modify the BM-QQ in the same way as the clamp is the same.
|
|
#8
05-28-2010, 03:35 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
