Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Vendor Forums > Aqua Digital > Bubble Magus Club

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:31 AM
Aqua-Digital's Avatar
Aqua-Digital Aqua-Digital is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,272
Aqua-Digital is on a distinguished road
Default

No

what site?

Here is the range

http://www.bubble-magus.com/en/produ...roductSort=293
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:37 AM
dallascowboys2 dallascowboys2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: maryland
Posts: 7
dallascowboys2 is on a distinguished road
Default

bubblemagusskimmers.com in your opinion will the bm 180cs be good for a 155gal tank or do you recomend another bm for under 350.00
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:39 AM
dallascowboys2 dallascowboys2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: maryland
Posts: 7
dallascowboys2 is on a distinguished road
Default

is cone shaped better
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:44 AM
Aqua-Digital's Avatar
Aqua-Digital Aqua-Digital is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,272
Aqua-Digital is on a distinguished road
Default

Research tells us cone shape is better as it draws the bubbles more vertically with less turbulance leading to greater DOC being trapped.

The site you show is one of the Chinese sites and the reason why Bubble Magus have now gone down the route of official distributors which we signed to last week. This resolves supply, variant pricing and warranty issues (which are rare).

You have a 600L system so the 180Cs is perfect.

Our dealers will have stock by mid to late February
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:47 AM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aqua-Digital View Post
Research tells us cone shape is better as it draws the bubbles more vertically with less turbulance leading to greater DOC being trapped.
Do you have a link to that Aqua, I would like to give that a read.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-17-2010, 03:12 AM
Aqua-Digital's Avatar
Aqua-Digital Aqua-Digital is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,272
Aqua-Digital is on a distinguished road
Default

You can always do what I did and google cone skimmer benefits, advantages research.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-22-2010, 06:43 PM
JDigital's Avatar
JDigital JDigital is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 2,795
JDigital is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to JDigital
Default

This is fantastic news. I will be getting my order in for sure!
__________________
180G Office Reef. Started Sept 2012 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=88894

62G Starfire Reef. Started Jan 2013 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=89988
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-31-2010, 04:42 PM
Canadian's Avatar
Canadian Canadian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 619
Canadian is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StirCrazy View Post
Do you have a link to that Aqua, I would like to give that a read.

Steve
Steve, I'm sure you've seen this but just in case you haven't here's the article: http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature

To date it (and the previous study/article), are the only "peer reviewed" articles I've seen published on TOC, and DOC removal for skimmers. This article indicates that the inclusion of a cone did not improve performance for the skimmers tested.
__________________
SPS Dedicated 24x24x20 Trimless Tank | 20 g Sump | Bubbble King Mini 160 Protein Skimmer w/ Avast Swabbie | NP Biopellets in TLF Phosban Reactor | ATI Sunpower 6 x 24W T5HO Fixture | EcoTech Vortech MP20 | Modified Tunze Nanostream 6025 | Eheim 1260 Return Pump | GHL Profilux Standalone Doser dosing B-Ionic | Steel Frame Epoxy Coated Stand with Maple Panels embedded with Neodymium Magnets

"Mens sana in corpore sano"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-31-2010, 08:32 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian View Post
Steve, I'm sure you've seen this but just in case you haven't here's the article: http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature

To date it (and the previous study/article), are the only "peer reviewed" articles I've seen published on TOC, and DOC removal for skimmers. This article indicates that the inclusion of a cone did not improve performance for the skimmers tested.
nope never saw that thanks.. confirmed some of my suspisions.. might as well spend 250 on a **** as it will preform just as good as that 900 buck bubble king

that was a good read as the only reading i coule find saying cones were better were from the people trying to sell them.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.

Last edited by Aqua-Digital; 01-31-2010 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.