![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Yes I did notice, did you notice the reasoning (noise not performance) and the fact it has nothing to do with my argument or why I quoted that? Like I said before some just love to argue but I didn't say 3-5x was wrong just that it's not a requirement and 10x will work equally well if you can deal with the higher flow. Also note the date of the article.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Like I already stated, it takes more experience to run higher flows through overflows properly, it's not for everyone and it's not necessarily better than lower flow. That article is for beginners, which you would have noticed if you read the title rather than immediately trying to find something to argue with. I would never tell a beginner to use 10x turnover just like I wouldn't tell one to use a herbie overflow either.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() You quoted the article to back up your statement, I am arguing no more than you are.
I have always promoted low flow, and have used syphon systems for many years, I have never advocated a Durso, a Durso is for people that have incorrectly sized their drains. Please refrain from accusing me of making this a personal issue. |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What has 10x total flow got to do with 10x sump rates? they ask for 3x sump rates and 10x total flow, not your 10x sump recommendation, trust me I read it properly, I think you were the one that used it to prove your point, but had not read it properly.
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
I never took a side and said what was wrong and what was right. Simply put, people think differently and have different priorities, low flow or high flow, it makes little difference. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|