Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-09-2009, 07:46 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

little dated and yes could be problems but here:

http://www.aquariumcontrollers.com/a...p#skimmerchart
__________________
my tank
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-09-2009, 07:56 PM
lastlight's Avatar
lastlight lastlight is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,997
lastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura about
Default

Best they can do is give you ballpark ideas and then you ask people who have experience with them I think.
__________________
Brett
My 67 392 225 101 94 34 97 404 28 93 209 gallon reef.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-09-2009, 08:03 PM
untamed's Avatar
untamed untamed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,248
untamed is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm recalling that study that recently tried to measure WHAT was being removed by skimmers and how quickly various models removed it.

I believe that their conclusions were that the "larger" skimmer (the one the processed a larger volume of water per hour) removed the measured stuff more quickly, but that all the skimmers tested reduced the measured stuff to about the same level given time.

It struck me that a big difference between the test environment and an actual aquarium is that the aquarium continually generates new waste so a truly undersized skimmer won't ever get the chance to catch up and waste could accumulate.

Yes, I agree...it is more about bioload than actual water volume.

IMHO, size matters. In order to increase the amount of water it can process per hour, the chamber needs to get bigger. Increasing the flow rate with a smaller chamber just reduces the amount of time the water is in contact with the air bubbles (dwell time). In my case, I wanted to get to 1.5x tank volume per hour (600gph) with 2 minute dwell time inside the skimmer. That means that I need to have a 20 gallon chamber....yikes!

After that, I didn't really pay attention to what the skimmer says it is rated for.
__________________
400 gal reef. Established April, 2007. 3 Sequence Dart, RM12-4 skimmer, 2 x OM4Ways, Yellow Tang, Maroon Clown (pair), Blonde Naso Tang, Vlamingi Tang, Foxface Rabbit, Unicorn Tang, 2 Pakistani Butterflies and a few coral gobies

My Tank: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=28436

Last edited by untamed; 10-09-2009 at 08:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-09-2009, 11:01 PM
golf nut golf nut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of Toronto
Posts: 454
golf nut is on a distinguished road
Default

BK will tell you in a heartbeat that you can overdo skimming by buying a unit that is oversize, it simply doesn't work, or should I say doesn't work properly.

I know there is a distinct difference between having the skimmer in the tank with no sump as compared to having a sump with a 10 times turnover, it just isn't the same, the tank install though ugly will work better every time, explaining it is a different matter.

Last edited by golf nut; 10-10-2009 at 07:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-10-2009, 04:23 PM
Palmer's Avatar
Palmer Palmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary SW
Posts: 362
Palmer is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr OM View Post
BK will tell you in a heartbeat that you can overdo skimming by buying a unit that is oversize, it simply doesn't work, or should I say doesn't work properly.

I know there is a distinct difference between having the skimmer in the tank with no sump as compared to having a sump with a 10 times turnover, it just isn't the same, the tank install though ugly will work better every time, explaining it is a different matter.
If the tank install works better every time then is it reasonable to assume a hang on the back skimmer on the main tank is also better than an in sump set up?

Palmer
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-10-2009, 05:48 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

In sump works better because of the overflow effect. The high specific gravity in salt tanks results in proteins/organics rising. the idea of the sump and overflow system is that the overflow constantly sends the top water from the display to the sump.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-11-2009, 05:20 AM
steveg steveg is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 52
steveg is on a distinguished road
Default Excluding the sump

Hi there, so you are suggesting that the best way to operate a skimmer is to take water directly from the display tank and return it there instead of doing that from the sump?





Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr OM View Post
BK will tell you in a heartbeat that you can overdo skimming by buying a unit that is oversize, it simply doesn't work, or should I say doesn't work properly.

I know there is a distinct difference between having the skimmer in the tank with no sump as compared to having a sump with a 10 times turnover, it just isn't the same, the tank install though ugly will work better every time, explaining it is a different matter.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-13-2009, 01:53 AM
robert robert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 221
robert is on a distinguished road
Default

Brad - I like your theory, it makes sense to me. I have a question though. Which of those 2 parameters is more tweak-able/forgiving - tank volume per hour or dwell time?

For example, I have ASM 5G with about 6gal cylinder capacity. Manufacturer suggested system size for this one is 700gal. Granted, real life users would not put this skimmer on anything bigger than 350-375gal. Now, applying your theory, keeping flow at 1.5x volume of the tank with 2 min. dwell time this skimmer is no good for anything bigger than 120gal. Which parameter would you tweak for bigger system? Volume per hour or dwell time? No, "Get a bigger skimmer" is not applicable answer at this time.

Thanks a lot.

Cheers.




Quote:
Originally Posted by untamed View Post
I'm recalling that study that recently tried to measure WHAT was being removed by skimmers and how quickly various models removed it.

I believe that their conclusions were that the "larger" skimmer (the one the processed a larger volume of water per hour) removed the measured stuff more quickly, but that all the skimmers tested reduced the measured stuff to about the same level given time.

It struck me that a big difference between the test environment and an actual aquarium is that the aquarium continually generates new waste so a truly undersized skimmer won't ever get the chance to catch up and waste could accumulate.

Yes, I agree...it is more about bioload than actual water volume.

IMHO, size matters. In order to increase the amount of water it can process per hour, the chamber needs to get bigger. Increasing the flow rate with a smaller chamber just reduces the amount of time the water is in contact with the air bubbles (dwell time). In my case, I wanted to get to 1.5x tank volume per hour (600gph) with 2 minute dwell time inside the skimmer. That means that I need to have a 20 gallon chamber....yikes!

After that, I didn't really pay attention to what the skimmer says it is rated for.

Last edited by robert; 10-13-2009 at 02:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-13-2009, 03:19 AM
littlesilvermax's Avatar
littlesilvermax littlesilvermax is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 779
littlesilvermax is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree that too big of a skimmer can happen, in real life it rarely happens, unless you are rich (or used to be).

Look at others that have exceptional systems, see what they use and copy them. Don't be afraid to spend a fair chunk of change, it is a very important part of the tank. And, unlike lighting, doesn't keep whacking your wallet with additional costs (cept monthly electricity).
__________________
250 BB Starphire SPS, clams, & zoos
3 x 250 DE, IC 660 W/T5s
OM 4-way, Hammerhead Pump
Calcium, Kalk, RO filters, magnesium, Excellent prices
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-13-2009, 05:42 AM
untamed's Avatar
untamed untamed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 2,248
untamed is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robert View Post
Brad - I like your theory, it makes sense to me. I have a question though. Which of those 2 parameters is more tweak-able/forgiving - tank volume per hour or dwell time?

For example, I have ASM 5G with about 6gal cylinder capacity. Manufacturer suggested system size for this one is 700gal. Granted, real life users would not put this skimmer on anything bigger than 350-375gal. Now, applying your theory, keeping flow at 1.5x volume of the tank with 2 min. dwell time this skimmer is no good for anything bigger than 120gal. Which parameter would you tweak for bigger system? Volume per hour or dwell time? No, "Get a bigger skimmer" is not applicable answer at this time.

Thanks a lot.

Cheers.
Yup, that is the math...If the chamber size is constant, then increasing flow rate (tank turnover) reduces dwell time and vice-versa. Assuming that you have re-circ'd the G5, then you can control the flow rate. If you haven't re-circ'd, then your flow rate is set by the amount of water drawn in by the NW pumps and you would have no control over it.

Really, controlling flow rate is one of the big reasons why one might choose a recirc skimmer over a non-recirc skimmer.

Given the limitation of the size, I would be inclined to try decreasing flow rate for increased dwell time. Playing with the flow rate a bit is certainly worthy of experimentation for sure.

Plus...if you wanted to increase the chamber size, you can have my old G6 body if you like.
__________________
400 gal reef. Established April, 2007. 3 Sequence Dart, RM12-4 skimmer, 2 x OM4Ways, Yellow Tang, Maroon Clown (pair), Blonde Naso Tang, Vlamingi Tang, Foxface Rabbit, Unicorn Tang, 2 Pakistani Butterflies and a few coral gobies

My Tank: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=28436
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.