Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Other > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:13 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banditpowdercoat View Post
HUHH??? Vista crashes and hangs more than any OS in the past. XP was way better IMO
Well, Windows ME was probably worse From a support side, we do have a lot more issues deploying Vista, mostly due to drivers. We're also implementing Bit Locker, which presents a whole new set of problems.
As a factory install, Windows 7 does seem to appear more robust than Vista.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-18-2009, 02:54 PM
xtreme xtreme is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 772
xtreme is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAbyss View Post
That said, I'm buying a Mac very soon. And this is the first I've heard of Windows 7... thanks for the heads up!
Can't go wrong with a Mac. I have been using Apples since I was like 3 years old and would take one over a Windows machine any day.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-18-2009, 04:10 PM
Ron99's Avatar
Ron99 Ron99 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,018
Ron99 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaz View Post
My Bud has it running on his Intel/Mac he was surprised how easy it was, he was expecting driver issues but had none.
Yeah but I can do anything I want or need under Mac OS.

That being said, I do have a slightly older XP box hooked up to the flat screen TV which I use occasionally as a media player or for the odd game. But it is frustrating. Had a video card fail (which got replaced under warranty) but was a pain to sort out. Now the ATI Catalyst Control Center won't run and I just haven't had time to sort that out. I've never had a major problem on a Mac that couldn't be sorted out fairly quickly and the only hardware failure I ever had was a faulty CD ROM that was promptly replaced under warranty.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:54 PM
BlueAbyss's Avatar
BlueAbyss BlueAbyss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Creighton, SK
Posts: 952
BlueAbyss is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banditpowdercoat View Post
HUHH??? Vista crashes and hangs more than any OS in the past. XP was way better IMO
LOL, I suppose you installed on an older XP machine? Wouldn't surprise me if you had problems... like when people went from 95 to 98, 98 to ME, ME to XP... etc etc. I had issues going from 3.11 to 95, too.

I suppose it helps that all the software on this computer is newer. I wouldn't want to go through the trouble to get a legacy program to work on a Windows machine, it's just not worth it. Unless you have thousands of dollars in old software...

Yup, definitely buying a Mac. I'm just tired of MS products.
__________________
Calvin
---
Planning a 29 gallon mixed reef...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-18-2009, 07:16 PM
subman's Avatar
subman subman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,509
subman is on a distinguished road
Default

I actually never had any problems with Vista after SP1 came out. That being said I use it in a HTPc that really only streams movies and music from a central home server.

I too switched to the new Macbook with my latest laptop but I still have XP in it as well!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-18-2009, 08:32 PM
Slick Fork's Avatar
Slick Fork Slick Fork is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 631
Slick Fork is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm running Vista on both my laptop and my desktop. I found vista easier to install then XP and have had no real significant problems on either machine. The laptop ran a little doggier until I boosted the RAM to 2 gigs but both run fine.

My only complaint about Vista has ever been that it uses more resources, but then it was the same way going from 98se to XP. I think a lot of the problems people have with Vista is that they are trying to put it on older machines without enough OOMPH to run it. Vista has received exactly the same kind of press that XP did in it's early days. I remember when XP launched and everybody HATED it, now it's the good old standby.

If windows 7 is a more efficient version of Vista then I am looking forward to it!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-18-2009, 08:59 PM
RuGlu6 RuGlu6 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver PoMo
Posts: 829
RuGlu6 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreef View Post
I actually bought a copy of xp,MS quit producing copies at the end of january.So when there all gone...I'm using xp...till i die
XP will not run on any quad core chips only on dual core, so unless you planning on keeping your machine till you die, we all gona have to decide if we want to run 7 or not.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:28 PM
Snaz's Avatar
Snaz Snaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,034
Snaz is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAbyss View Post
I wouldn't want to go through the trouble to get a legacy program to work on a Windows machine, it's just not worth it. Unless you have thousands of dollars in old software...
Windows 7 comes with a Win XP SP3 Virtual Machine(not crummy compatibility mode) so you can continue to use your favourite XP software.

Yes I would certainly say Windows 7 uses less resources and is faster than Vista. From a cold boot I can open Firefox and surf Canreef.com in less than 45 seconds, with Vista this probably took two full minutes to do.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-19-2009, 12:39 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaz View Post
with Vista this probably took two full minutes to do.
Try processing 6000 GPOs and see how quickly it boots
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:28 AM
muck's Avatar
muck muck is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB (West)
Posts: 4,329
muck is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RuGlu6 View Post
XP will not run on any quad core chips only on dual core, so unless you planning on keeping your machine till you die, we all gona have to decide if we want to run 7 or not.
Where did you get that info from?!?!... I just bought 2 quad core machines and installed xp on them with no problems.

That being said I am going to install Windows 7 on my laptop and play around with it. Anyone know if there are any issues with XP and W7 both running on a network?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.