![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I am having trouble deciding on how I should set up my returns for the new tank with each side drilled I plan on hooking up an SCWD to it somehow to get some nice current going, i thought of that AND having to more returns come over the back of the tank. As for rock there will be 1 pile in each of the back corners. I want to have lots of flow in it as this was a MAJOR problem with my previous tank...I want to try to get ~1000gph.....any suggestions
![]() ![]() |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() You've probably mentioned this before... but what size tank and the dimensions of it?
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() 50gal - 36x18x18
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Are we talking about the sump return, or a closed loop? I can't remember if you've said this already, so ... um .. sorry if I'm asking yet another question that's already been answered once before .... but, are you considering a closed loop at all?
The reason I ask this, I'm not really big on a lot of sump turnover any more. Obviously there is a minimum threshold. But the more the water rushes through the sump, the more you need to look at more dams and baffles and whatnot to prevent bubbles from reaching the pump intake, and becoming a microbubble nuisance in the main display. To me, the ideal situation is a sump turnover that is "just enough" or a little more than minimal, and then making up the rest of the water movement through other means -- powerheads, closed loops or semi-closed loops (ie pump intake hidden inside the overflow).
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() well, definately not against a closed loop, but i really didn't want to (if possible) of any powerheads in the tank....So i supposed I could have the 2 holes on a closed loop then have the scwd hooked up to the returns....I would really like to have the scwd hooked up to the 2 side holes, but not sure if thats possible if i make that a closded loop.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Oh right! You have that starphire 50 gal.. now I remember
![]() Have you ever seen the post on RC about the closed loop using a SCWD? http://www.sparklingfloorservice.com...losedloop.html It looks like it produces some awesome current and would work quite nice on a tank that size. I've thought about using it on my 120 with a bigger Mag pump but I forget what the SCWD's are maxed out at (gph). |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Jack, I checked the manual - "the unit is approved for use with pump applications not to exceed 1400 gph and a max of 5psi". I hooked mine to a MAK4 - so far so good - has been running for approx 3 months
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() How fast does it change direction of flow on a MAK4?
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I would say about 30 sec at max flow.
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Is the switching very loud or nice and quiet??
__________________
If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year killing everyone |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|