![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
View Poll Results: Would you like an increase in LIVESTOCK budget? | |||
No. Leave the budget as is. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 22.22% |
$50 Increase. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 22.22% |
$100 Increase. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 44.44% |
$150 Increase. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 11.11% |
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() This latest point is mostly my fault I made the suggestion originally for the extra money to be for livestock only. However that's basically impossible since only one budget exists and it includes both equipment and livestock. So unless JDigital has something else in mind the only way to do this increase would be to increase the one and only budget which is for both equipment and livestock, but the idea was to allow for more livestock not equipment.
I also agree that if people really feel that strongly about the initial budget that they'll quit the contest we should forget about the increase. Honestly the idea was to benefit all equally and although I might argue with you all to the death if in the end you still feel no increase should take place then I guess the only fair result will be to keep things as originally decided. But remember despite some of the previous arguments this is for fun and try and think of the other people in the contest rather than just yourselves. Last edited by sphelps; 10-27-2008 at 03:55 AM. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I don't think anyone here can be blamed for thinking only of themselves. I think we're all thinking of the fairness and the original context/guidelines of the rules.
__________________
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted. Sarah |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|