|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
09-09-2008, 11:16 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
I would calibrate it with 4.0 and 7.0 this will make more accurate at a predominate level of 6.60.
Tom R 
|
|
#3
09-10-2008, 01:00 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
might make it more accurate but the slope is probably close enough for a reactor with 7 and 10.
Should try a little experiment with a solution of say around 6.6 or at the least cal with the 7 and 10 and tell us what the 4 comes in at.
|
|
#4
09-10-2008, 01:22 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Typically when using a PH probe to measure your tank PH you Calibrate at 7 and 10. If you are using the probe in a CA reactor you Calibrate and 4 and 7.
The difference is very noticable when using the probe in the reactor. I went from calibrating at 7 and 10 to 4 and 7 and my probe rose 0.4. That is a lot when it come to melting Calcium carbonate J
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
