![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() A sequence snapper would give you 1900gph at 4'
http://www.jlaquatics.com/phpstore/s...ct_ID=wp-seq00
__________________
75g 24x30x24 w/external overflow 35 sump/fuge 250w Ice Cap MH with Radium 20k & Luminarc Reflector PS4 Return -PCI Chiller - WavySea 2 x Tunze 6101 H&S A150-2001 2 x Deltec Reactors Carbon/Phosban Profilux Plus II |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Hey Brandy, being a self-described newbie I'm wondering (no offense intended) if you are aware how much it will cost you to setup a 170g SPS tank successfully? You're looking at a house down payment.
You're going to need a bigger sump to handle the flow, a bigger return pump, bigger powerheads, and a Wavemaker would be a great idea. Not to mention a mass of other equipment you haven't mentioned (lights, reactors, skimmer, etc). Being a newbie, I would suggest you try your hand at a much smaller SPS tank, and see if you have the knack for it to begin with. Try a 75g or something like that. Jmo... ![]() Last edited by Myka; 08-23-2008 at 11:32 PM. |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() What do you think a 75G with a 54G (actual tank size) would require for a moderate SPS system (mixed with softies)
I think my current system is around 2200-2300gph.. (total flow) return is something like 550-600, then 2 K3's.
__________________
180G Office Reef. Started Sept 2012 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=88894 62G Starfire Reef. Started Jan 2013 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=89988 |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() 2200gph, most of which is coming from your K3's, is not really enough for SPS
__________________
Brad |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
180G Office Reef. Started Sept 2012 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=88894 62G Starfire Reef. Started Jan 2013 http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=89988 |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Personally, I wouldn't do a huge return pump as too much flow through your sump can have several downsides including extra salt creep from all the splashing, but more importantly the water will be bypassing your skimmer too quickly for it to properly do its job. A big honkin' return will also use a lot of electricity and add a lot of extra heat to the system.
My trusty Eheim 1260 on my 150 gallon system only does around ~500 gph max at 4' and I even have it tee'd off to run a UV. The majority of your display tank flow should come from powerheads (Tunze/Vortech) and/or a closed-loop. Last edited by fkshiu; 08-24-2008 at 03:24 AM. |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I agree ^, but personally I like about 6-7x turnover through the sump compared to a lot of peopl who have 10-20x or more through their sump. Then use powerheads and closed loops to get the flow in the tank that your corals need.
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Ya, I also only have about 5x thru my sump. Let's the skimmer and carbon do it's thing. Ideally the flow should come from power heads or closed loop, as already mentioned.
__________________
Brad |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() As being recommended, I'll upgrade my returns (3 pumps.) Right now 165GPH to be about 320GPH each (at the out-puts in the tank ). But besides, I talked to my uncle in LA, he'll ship to me 2 of the Tunze ( He's reef guy so he will know what to buy for my tank So after upgrade, my return rate would be 950GPH = about 5 times turnover But flow will be very strong, around 1800-2000GPH as he mentioned. I dont want to go for strong return and so, as you said, the skimmers will be useless. Thanks, |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|