Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2007, 07:07 PM
digital-audiophile's Avatar
digital-audiophile digital-audiophile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SE Calgary - DouglasGlen
Posts: 1,456
digital-audiophile is on a distinguished road
Default

I'll get the name of the test at home.. for some reason it is eluding me right now I've used two different kits though (same manufacturer) so I dont think it might not be a false negative

I am using instant ocean salt (same bucket that I use on my old tank without issues) I'll test the source water tonight too.

I used 30+ lbs of new sand but seeded it with sand from my other tank.

I'll clarify the nitrate level when I am home as well the test marker only gives in 20PPM incriments if I recall correctly.

I've been changing about 20 Gallons of water each week since I started cycling.

The only life in the tank right now are a dozen snails and a couple hermits. I have been waiting for the tank to cycle before I move three fish over from my other tank (I am closing it down as I traded it for the 90 and want to finish my end of the deal.)

I'll also tesk for alk and calcium tonight.

Thanks for the advice guys, keep it coming
__________________
- Greg

90G : Light - Tek 6xT5 | Skim - EuroReef RS135 | Flow - 2xVortech MP40W | Control - Reef Keeper 2

Last edited by digital-audiophile; 04-27-2007 at 07:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2007, 07:50 PM
ponokareefer's Avatar
ponokareefer ponokareefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ponoka, Alberta
Posts: 859
ponokareefer is on a distinguished road
Default

If you normally shop at a particular LFS, you could take a sample of your water down to them and have them test it for you. That will rule out for sure if your tests are both wrong.
__________________
240 gallon tank build: http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...d.php?t=110073
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2007, 08:04 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I actually would not rule out the false positive still Greg. Some test kits just aren't very robust, although they may say "good for FW or SW" they're not really that good in SW. I never test for ammonia. I do have an ammonia test kit though that will always give a low non-zero value in SW.

Just for kicks, test for ammonia on your old tank. I'm willing to bet you get a positive value on that one. By your nitrite and nitrate values, that tank is has finished its initial cycle. If you had ammonia, you would have nitrite.

In fact, it's almost pointless to test ammonia. It's only in the most serious of tank crashes, or massive death events, that you'd get an ammonia reading anyhow. In 9 years of keeping reefs I've never really had to test for ammonia, and the one time I thought I did, I was completely baffled by the fact that I was showing an ammonia reading when in fact it was a false positive and the problem was something else. I don't even remember what it was, but I remember thinking "why does the ammonia reading always read "X" no matter what I do?"

I'm thinking you may want a different nitrate test kit too. Increments of 20 isn't very high resolution. A reef you want nitrates to be under 10 (not really a hard and fast rule, but typically, a reef has very low nitrates like 2 to 5 ish). The Salifert ones are not bad, the Elos ones are pretty good too. I used to use Seachem and they weren't too bad but I haven't seen them for sale anywhere for a while.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2007, 08:27 PM
hawk hawk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Terrace b.c.
Posts: 176
hawk is on a distinguished road
Default

Six weeks is not out of the question to still be cycling. I just finished cycling a qt tank and it took 6 -7 weeks (left a couple of frozen shrimp in a bit too long). Water changes during a cycle are not required and will only lengthen the cycle time.

Last edited by hawk; 04-27-2007 at 08:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2007, 09:07 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Ordinarily I would agree with you hawk but his nitrite numbers are zero and his nitrate values are climbing. If the tank had not completed its ammonia cycle, it would not have completed its nitrite cycle and there would be a non-zero value for nitrite.

Now, it's possible that the nitrite test kit is giving a false negative, but IMHO this is less likely than an ammonia test kit giving a false positive. If the ammonia reading is non-zero but low (ie. close to zero) and unchanging over a long period of time, I would distrust that reading. If it is changing then it is likely valid, but unchanging is suspect, espescially if nitrite is zero.

FWIW some people will start up a new tank with existing rock and existing water and start stocking it the next day. Basically If you have the appropriate mass of rock a cycle can be very quick. With over 100lbs of rock (so over 1lb/gal), with 2/3 being cycled rock already .... I think it's a pretty safe bet that his initial cycle is done.

Tell you what, here's a real acid test, throw a frag of something like GSP or zoos or something in the tank and see how they do. If there's ammonia they won't open up, if they do open up though then it's probably safe to start moving other things in there.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2007, 11:42 PM
Quagmire's Avatar
Quagmire Quagmire is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 588
Quagmire is on a distinguished road
Default

I talked to Greg a couple weeks ago and he mentioned these readings.At the time I thought perhaps it was a smaller cycle starting due to bacteria die off.But now with no change I'm leaning towards the test kit also.At the worst a good test kit will strike one possibility off the list.
__________________
No matter how hard you try, you can't baptise cats.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2007, 02:10 AM
digital-audiophile's Avatar
digital-audiophile digital-audiophile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SE Calgary - DouglasGlen
Posts: 1,456
digital-audiophile is on a distinguished road
Default

Well guys, it seems that I may indeed have mud on my face

I tested the tank again tonight ... 0.5 ammonia, I tested my existing cube... 0.5 ammonia, I tested a rubbermaid bucket I have had mixing new salt water in for the past week .. guess what 0.5 Ammonia. I did test my fresh water source and it was 0.0 .. I did this with two seperate test kits and came up with the same results so I agree that I am getting a false positive and that the SW is throwing off the tests. I used to read zero on my old tank with the same kits but that was a long time ago that I tested it. The kits are ~1 year old so that could be why.

Oh, they are Aquarium Pharmaceutical test kits.

I tested the params on the rest of the tank and found the following :

Nitrite : 0.0
Nitrate 20
PH 8.2
KH 179
Calcium 280
Iron 0.0
Phosphate 0.0
Salinity 1.022

I need to try to bring my phosphates down and calcium up. This is going to be FOWL and maybe add some zoos or shrooms thats about it, I want to eventually ad some non reef safe fish (copperband, flame angel, coral beauty) so I don't want to risk and coral that may get nipped at. Now I guess I can bring my fishies over and close down the cube. Three in total - Perc Clown, Sixline Wrasse and a small Purple Tang. I have my skimmer/sump running full time now so I wouldn't imagine this should be too much of a bioload to add at once.
__________________
- Greg

90G : Light - Tek 6xT5 | Skim - EuroReef RS135 | Flow - 2xVortech MP40W | Control - Reef Keeper 2
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2007, 05:18 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Not sure about the coral beauty but the flame and the CBB are usually pretty good reef citizens. The most likely things to get nipped at will be LPS and clam mantles. I have a CBB with clams and it's fine, dumb fish only eats mysis. Only reason I don't have a flame angel is that I have a potter's angel and I feel it's a bad idea to have different pygmy angels except for in maybe larger tanks (which at 75g mine is not). Anyhow I guess this is neither here nor there but just thought I'd share my thoughts on that - those fish you want could be just fine in a reef. As always there are exceptions but there's reason enough to hope for the best.

As for the testkits .. yeah, not surprised. My suggestion, use up the AP testkits for now, but when they're done, get something like Salifert or Elos. For phosphate there's also now the D-D/Merck test kit, which is pricey but gives you a nice precision on the low range.

I only test for nitrate, phosphate, and alkalinity (use a test kit that measures in meq/l - more on that later). If I'm really crazy I'll test for Ca but I usually don't have to, since I use a calcium reactor, and if it's dialed in right, Ca will usually be a number pretty close to 100 times the number of the alkalinity (if expressed in meq/l). Ie. if my alk is 3.1 meq/l dollars to donuts I'll find my Ca is 310. This is only when things are dialed in right though, if things get out of whack it's necessary to track both.

Or if you want to get really crazy, you can get a nitrate monitor and a phosphate colorimeter, basically a digital reading of the value. Pricey though, only go this route if (like me) you find yourself absolutely hating the process of deciding which colour of pink matches the colour of pinks on the chart.

Most Ca and Alk test kits are of a titration basis which is nice, which means you count the drops until you get a colour change (usually from pink to blue). Hard to miss the transition and you have a definitive volume value which in turn gives you a number you can have a high degree of confidence in, unlike trying to guess at colour matching.

And as for pH test kits ... I haven't met one yet that I didn't hate. If you ever decide on a calcium reactor, forget trying to dial it in with a test kit, you'll never do it. Invest the $100 in a pH meter or controller .. it will be one of the best $100 you spend on the hobby.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.