|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: If skimmers didn't exist, which would be your next choice? | |||
| Wet/Dry (trickle) filter |
   
|
12 | 8.51% |
| Fluidized bed filter |
  
|
5 | 3.55% |
| UV sterilizer |
  
|
9 | 6.38% |
| Mechanical filter |
  
|
10 | 7.09% |
| Live rock/sand bed (exclusively) |
  
|
75 | 53.19% |
| Carbon filter |
  
|
14 | 9.93% |
| Other |
|
16 | 11.35% |
| Voters: 141. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
02-21-2006, 07:55 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
Ditto that, but does refugium include mangrove? Cause thats what I would do, fuge/mangrove combo.
Infact, I want to try that on a large tank, lol.
__________________
No more tanks  - Laying off the ReefCrack for awhile!Cheers, Chris 
|
|
#2
02-21-2006, 03:16 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I vote large macro fuge as well
|
|
#3
02-21-2006, 04:54 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Live rock cause that what I use now
__________________
Murray I reserve the right to hijack any thread I want to!! My carbon footprint is bigger than your carbon footprint !!!!
|
|
#4
02-21-2006, 05:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Macro (chaeto, red halimenia & prolifera) & lowered feeding rates.
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
