![]() |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
likeit was said skimmerless is fine for nanos that benifit from frequent large water changes, but I have yet to see a large tank that has been totaly sucessfull skimmerless.. years and yease ago when I was .. how do you put it... Less ethical ops: and befor we knew what deep sand beds and skimmers were.. I had a fish only with rock.. and boy the problems I had with it as far as algae.. I can tell you from experence that the tank I have running now is such a pleasure to "not have to do hardly anything ", to keep it good looking.when I first started researching thistank I said skimmer shimmer.. who needs that.. now after finaly running a good skimmer on a larger tank I would never try skimmerless again. well maby in a 10 gal tank PS.. please excuse my spelling mistakes.. pretty sad for some one who graduated from highschool with honers eh... ops: Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive. |