Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 06-01-2006, 09:40 PM
GMGQ's Avatar
GMGQ GMGQ is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 400
GMGQ is on a distinguished road
Default

That doesnt tell me actinics are not the problem. You're still running another source of light. The equation is:

Nutrients + Light = Algae

Whether it's actinics or another source, any light still plays a role in the growth of algae. Now if you had NO LIGHTS yet still had hair algae, then you can say 'lights' are not the problem. It's like when people cook their LR. No light = No algae.

With any source of algae, yes, you want to tackle the root source of the problem -- which are Nutrients.

But in the short term, if he cuts back on the lighting period, the hair algae should slow down as well.


Quote:
Originally Posted by TheReefGeek
Heck im not running actinics and I have hair algae, and when I did run actinics I had zero hair algae, so what does that tell ya? That nutrients are the problem, not the actinics.
__________________
Gary
Tank was up for 7yrs and 10months. Thanks Everyone!

2016/2017 180Gallon Build Coming Soon...
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.