New lighting tests. Interesting resutls. as per usual.

[DJ88]

Victor,

The inverse law I suggested is just for an approximation. I seriously doubt that anyone here is going to sit and do the calculus involved. I can help out anyone wanting to if they so decide to. :rolleyes:

If we were to get into specifics the only way a MH could be concidered a point source is if it were either being measured far enough away that the radius of the light source wouldn't measurably change as we moved the sensor. At that distance we'd be wasting our time and energy.

[ 19 June 2002, 15:06: Message edited by: DJ88 ]