|
|
|
||||||||
| Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| View Poll Results: Would an all inclusive coral/fish database be usefull? | |||
| Coral and Fish. I would use it all the time! |
   
|
123 | 89.78% |
| Just corals. Fish don't need to be included. |
  
|
5 | 3.65% |
| No I use other resources. |
  
|
9 | 6.57% |
| Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
04-12-2012, 05:38 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
I have an issue with contributing to Blue World's WIKI as it would be their property and that could cause some problems.
How about we either contribute to wikipedia.com entries by including a hobbyists section for each existing entry or create new ones as needed and then build a relevant index to the wikipedia.com entries. Or build new wiki from scratch. I think expanding on wikipedia.com entries is the best solution as it is independent, already hosted and already contains LOTS of coral and fish entries.
__________________
|
| Tags |
| coral, database, fish, poll |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
