Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-08-2013, 08:51 PM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus Proteus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,784
Proteus is on a distinguished road
Default Lighting/sps Q

Last year I tried a experiment where I ran 2 photoperiods on sps tank. 6 on 6 off

The coral loved it got great color. Fish not so much. It drove them bat sh!t crazy.

Since I no longer have a mass fish. And the ones I do house are semi cryptic to cryptic. I want to do it again

Question is.

Do you think it would be harmful to run one photoperiod at 10k and the other at 20k?

I wouldn't think it to be bad as alot of tanks that run mh/t5 are set at different times so the colors are not always blended

This way I may be able to get growth of 10k during my away time and 20k for color while I'm home to watch
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-08-2013, 08:56 PM
duncangweller's Avatar
duncangweller duncangweller is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 681
duncangweller is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm glad you posted as I was trying to find the other thread about two photo periods and was curious of the results.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-08-2013, 09:40 PM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus Proteus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,784
Proteus is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by duncangweller View Post
I'm glad you posted as I was trying to find the other thread about two photo periods and was curious of the results.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 4
From my experience to corals did very well. I had great PE and they really colored up.
I did alot of reading on the blackout time and could not find anything about extended dark periods. Although coral does need a dark photoperiod 4/6 hours is plenty. And photo saturation happens in a limited time depending on intensity. So in theory simulating 2 days in one should increase growth not adding 1 full year but more like 1.5 simulated years to 1 actual years. This should also allow for more intensity during lights on period to archive photo saturation

I just don't want to shock the corals with 2 different colors
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-09-2013, 05:31 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

I don't think I quite understand what you mean by two photo periods. Do you mean your lights are on during two different times of the day? Like 6 hours on, then 6 hours off, then 6 hours on again ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-09-2013, 05:39 PM
Bblinks's Avatar
Bblinks Bblinks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coquitlam B.C.
Posts: 3,033
Bblinks is on a distinguished road
Default

Like a grow op for plants, you know 6 on 6 off cycle....
__________________
Though a tree grow ever so high, the falling leaves return to the root.

300DD - 140DD



TOTM Fall 2013
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-09-2013, 05:50 PM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus Proteus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,784
Proteus is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kien View Post
I don't think I quite understand what you mean by two photo periods. Do you mean your lights are on during two different times of the day? Like 6 hours on, then 6 hours off, then 6 hours on again ?
Yep exactly. There 6 on 6 off right now

There's alot of literature that sps only need 4 hours of intense light. Once photo saturation has occurred the light is wasted.

There was a study done in Hawaii on this since they have seen 40 days of rain with little to minimal light.

Lps on the other hand has shown slightly negative effects losing to much Zooxanthella.

I did this before with good results. As of now the lights are 6 hours @20k 6 off 6 hours @14k 6 off. Would like to take the 14k cycle and turn to 10k but not sure if it would shock the coral
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-09-2013, 07:16 PM
tang daddy's Avatar
tang daddy tang daddy is offline
Likes to play with Fish
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,482
tang daddy is on a distinguished road
Default

In most parts of the ocean most acropora are no more than 5 meters down, this is strictly based on my own observation... When I went diving off one of the smaller islands in Nha trang, Vietnam I noticed huge tabling acros just a few feet below the water and ofcourse the montiporas were deeper but alot of the acros enjoyed the light at the surface. Acros that grow near the surface are definately in 10k or even 6500k light, quite a warm colour. Take into consideration their colour was abit tanned, I wouldn't see a problem using 10k as you would get vibrant pinks purple reds and green although it could also promote algae growth.

I guess it would be an experiment to try, but it all depends on what is aesthetically pleasing to you. For me I like to view my acros under 20k lighting, I hardly ever bother looking at my tank during the day, only view it at night when it's quiet and all the corals pop.
__________________
Always looking for the next best coral...

90g starphire cube/400mhRadium20k/2 XHO/2x27w UV/2x39w T5/ 3 Trulumen led strips
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-09-2013, 07:36 PM
Proteus's Avatar
Proteus Proteus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 2,784
Proteus is on a distinguished road
Default

That's why I was wanting to different k values. The
4am till 10am at 10k to encourage growth and 4pm to 10 pm at 20k for my viewing pleasure
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-09-2013, 07:44 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Interesting. Personally I don't see the 10K bulbs being a problem for your SPS. When I first started this tank I was running 10K halides with supplemental actinic T5s. Sometimes my T5s would burn out and it would take me a few weeks to find replacements and in the meantime, my tank would be strictly on the 10K bulbs for days. I didn't notice any change really. 10Ks definitely do grow SPS fast. They also grow algae fast too though as Chris suggested. I recall film algae on my glass being a problem every 24 hours. In fact, that's how I can tell when my current 14K bulbs are warn out. They shift closer to 10K and as a result I start to get film algae a lot quicker.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-09-2013, 07:47 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Proteus View Post
That's why I was wanting to different k values. The
4am till 10am at 10k to encourage growth and 4pm to 10 pm at 20k for my viewing pleasure
That's actually similar to what most people with Halide and T5 combo units do, isn't it? That's kinda what I do.

My 22K T5s are on from 10am to 10pm for my viewing pleasure.
From 1pm to 8pm the 14K halides are on for growing. The only difference being that my two photo periods overlap during the "growing" hours.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.