#1
|
||||
|
||||
Phosban reactor question
I am getting ready to set up a phosban reactor. Do you run these reactors continuously or just when they are needed. Would it hurt to run them steady.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Continually for your reactor. Nice slow bed movement, just enough to turn the media over
Sent Via Pirate Ship....... |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
I run my carbon at a slow flow, just enough for a small tumble at the surface of the media and for phosphate I run it with high flow.
__________________
Though a tree grow ever so high, the falling leaves return to the root. 300DD - 140DD TOTM Fall 2013 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
As per all my knowledge all media is to be slow tumble.... But you can double check anything and all advice from anyone. Lol
Sent Via Pirate Ship....... |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
I don't want to start an arguement but I've seen the opposite recommended In the quote below ( taken from this thread ), Doug says higher flow for carbon, and lower flow for gfo Quote:
I've been running my carbon at a 'high boil' and my gfo at a more conservative 'rumble' I've read 'boiling' carbon can allow particles to enter the DT and cause HLLE, so my carbon exits before my socks ... What's the correct flow rates ? Edit: To answer your question; It's up to you. I run both of mine 24/7 but you could run them only when you need them Last edited by gregzz4; 09-22-2012 at 02:00 AM. |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
^^^Trouble maker^^^^^
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
I thought carbon was not to be tumbled as it grinds it up, I pack my carbon between sponges to keep it stationary.
I soft boil my gfo just enough to keep it moving throughout the reactor.
__________________
Crap happens, that's why they sell toilet paper in 48 roll packs! |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Dan Dan
__________________
Link to my Tank Upgrade Thread Dan Leus, Marine Biologist 20+ Years Marine Aquarium Experience Save the Reef, Buy a Frag! |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
So what I've read, and been told, about using 1 cup of carbon in a TLF 150 for my 110g total system is not the best idea ...
I see the point where there will be no concern about carbon break-down and subsequent HLLE, or other issues, with a full reactor Guess I'll be filling my reactor to the top from now on |