Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Filtration and Skimmer Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2012, 11:28 PM
sully08 sully08 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: sherwood park
Posts: 86
sully08 is on a distinguished road
Default Phosban reactor question

I am getting ready to set up a phosban reactor. Do you run these reactors continuously or just when they are needed. Would it hurt to run them steady.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-21-2012, 11:56 PM
Salt2Death Salt2Death is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Whitecourt Ab
Posts: 182
Salt2Death is on a distinguished road
Default

Continually for your reactor. Nice slow bed movement, just enough to turn the media over


Sent Via Pirate Ship.......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-22-2012, 12:30 AM
Bblinks's Avatar
Bblinks Bblinks is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Coquitlam B.C.
Posts: 3,033
Bblinks is on a distinguished road
Default

I run my carbon at a slow flow, just enough for a small tumble at the surface of the media and for phosphate I run it with high flow.
__________________
Though a tree grow ever so high, the falling leaves return to the root.

300DD - 140DD



TOTM Fall 2013
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-22-2012, 12:47 AM
Salt2Death Salt2Death is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Whitecourt Ab
Posts: 182
Salt2Death is on a distinguished road
Default

As per all my knowledge all media is to be slow tumble.... But you can double check anything and all advice from anyone. Lol


Sent Via Pirate Ship.......
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-22-2012, 01:50 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bblinks View Post
I run my carbon at a slow flow, just enough for a small tumble at the surface of the media and for phosphate I run it with high flow.
Hmm ... maybe we could get some clarity here
I don't want to start an arguement but I've seen the opposite recommended

In the quote below ( taken from this thread ), Doug says higher flow for carbon, and lower flow for gfo
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishytime View Post
flow to carbon should be around 400-600 GPH and flow to GFO should be around 200-400 GPH....personally Ive only ever used "Rowaphos" and its supposed to look like boiling water when it has proper flow, so definitely not aggressively tumbling....cant speak for other kinds/brands of GFO


I've been running my carbon at a 'high boil' and my gfo at a more conservative 'rumble'

I've read 'boiling' carbon can allow particles to enter the DT and cause HLLE, so my carbon exits before my socks ...

What's the correct flow rates ?



Edit: To answer your question;
It's up to you. I run both of mine 24/7 but you could run them only when you need them

Last edited by gregzz4; 09-22-2012 at 02:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-22-2012, 01:53 AM
jorjef's Avatar
jorjef jorjef is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Regina
Posts: 983
jorjef is on a distinguished road
Default

^^^Trouble maker^^^^^
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-22-2012, 01:53 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jorjef View Post
^^^Trouble maker^^^^^
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-22-2012, 01:57 AM
Cal_stir's Avatar
Cal_stir Cal_stir is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Corunna, On.
Posts: 647
Cal_stir is on a distinguished road
Default

I thought carbon was not to be tumbled as it grinds it up, I pack my carbon between sponges to keep it stationary.
I soft boil my gfo just enough to keep it moving throughout the reactor.
__________________
Crap happens, that's why they sell toilet paper in 48 roll packs!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-22-2012, 02:38 AM
FragIt Dan's Avatar
FragIt Dan FragIt Dan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Posts: 337
FragIt Dan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal_stir View Post
I thought carbon was not to be tumbled as it grinds it up, I pack my carbon between sponges to keep it stationary.
I soft boil my gfo just enough to keep it moving throughout the reactor.
+1 ... I am under the impression that tumbling carbon erodes it which releases carbon dust into the tank. I have read some primary literature that showed the carbon dust can cause a disease in some species of fish. I have always fixed my carbon in place (ie inside a bag or between sponges) and fluidized my GFO at a light tumble.
Dan


Dan
__________________
Link to my Tank Upgrade Thread
Dan Leus, Marine Biologist
20+ Years Marine Aquarium Experience
Save the Reef, Buy a Frag!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-22-2012, 02:52 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

So what I've read, and been told, about using 1 cup of carbon in a TLF 150 for my 110g total system is not the best idea ...
I see the point where there will be no concern about carbon break-down and subsequent HLLE, or other issues, with a full reactor

Guess I'll be filling my reactor to the top from now on
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.