Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-14-2004, 08:41 PM
MitchM's Avatar
MitchM MitchM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Water Valley, AB
Posts: 1,280
MitchM is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpentersreef
I've added unrinsed mysis to the first post.

Mitch, would you mind to repeat the test with rinsed mysis (and please describe the method used for rinsing, how long, etc. to try to put some kind of quantifier on it)? It would be interesting to see the difference. Thanks
Tony, I've got another 18 grams of mysis thawing right now, and once thawed, I'll be rinsing them in R/O just enough to get rid of the "juice". After that I'll re-weigh them and soak them.

I'm a little surprised at the results of the unrinsed mysis. I would have thought that the phosphate would have been tied up in the meat of the shrimp and would not have "leached" out into the water.

Rikko, I'm trying this out as far as what methods a typical reefkeeper would choose to feed the tank with. I haven't heard of anybody rinsing nori yet, although there may be a benefit there. I don't know if I'll try that test or not.

Mitch
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-14-2004, 09:01 PM
MitchM's Avatar
MitchM MitchM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Water Valley, AB
Posts: 1,280
MitchM is on a distinguished road
Default

Tony,

As for your post regarding proximity of macros and SPS, I found that interesting, and it's something that I had forgotten about. Thanks.
I agree, macro algae harvesting (as in throwing it out and not feeding it back to your fish) is only one part of the equation.
Randy mentioned that skimming is another one, and for some of us, the only real means of nutrient export.
One problem with using a protein skimmer is that the suspended detritus/DOC's actually have to make it to the skimmer in order for the skimmer to do it's job. In a high energy, SPS reef/bare bottom set-up with tons of water flow and turnover it's not so much of a problem, but if you add a DSB, densely packed rock piles and some LPS, all of a sudden you have areas of low flow where detritus can build up and cause nuisance algae problems over time.
You could have the best skimmer in the world, but if you have low-flow-only LPS, the detritus will build up and never get to the skimmer. That's where macro algaes could help out, I think.

Just for fun, I tested the P04 in my skimmate. 10ml of skimmate in 1 liter of water showed a reading of .25ppm. That's what, 25ppm P04 skimmate...
Glad to get that out of my tank!

Mitch
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-14-2004, 10:19 PM
Rikko's Avatar
Rikko Rikko is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 345
Rikko is on a distinguished road
Default Re: reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by danny zubot
Rikko said:
Quote:
I don't know if anyone's mentioned it in this post, but has anybody tried vodka for PO4 reduction?
I read that those tests were not done very scientifically and that the results were based on "eye balling" the various changes. I got the impression that the reefers doing the experiment were also experimenting on themselves.

What article did you read? I'd like to compare with the one I read.
This was the thread I'd been reading, though there were others I didn't bookmark:
http://reefcentral.com/forums/showth...hreadid=288714

It's since grown rather... Large. From what Randy has said it sounds like you need to find the acceptable alcohol input for your particular tank and find it gradually. Add it with a dropped and test your phosphates over time.

I'll give it a shot when my phosphates become a concern.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-17-2004, 02:47 AM
MitchM's Avatar
MitchM MitchM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Water Valley, AB
Posts: 1,280
MitchM is on a distinguished road
Default

Thawed and rinsed mysis results added.
The P04 measurement was less than the frozen number, but I think that it was due to the reduced amount of material, not that it was due to the "juice" being any worse.
I'm not sure whether it's beneficial or not to rinse the frozen mysis first, as some people do. The particle size of the juice could wind up being bacteria food, or the corals could indeed be benefitting.
Any opinions?

Mitch
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-17-2004, 02:12 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carpentersreef
The particle size of the juice could wind up being bacteria food, or the corals could indeed be benefitting.
Any opinions?

Mitch
I agree with you on this but I only feed mysis once a week. If I was feeding every day I might be tempted to rinse.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-17-2004, 03:42 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Just curious Steve, how much mysis do you put in when you just feed weekly?
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-17-2004, 11:11 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus
Just curious Steve, how much mysis do you put in when you just feed weekly?
I cut a chunk off that is about 1cmx1cmx1.5cm I would say. I use it as more of a treet for them and use pellets the rest of the time.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-05-2012, 07:15 PM
rickcasa rickcasa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
rickcasa is on a distinguished road
Default

great info

Last edited by rickcasa; 01-05-2012 at 07:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-06-2012, 02:03 AM
Dyspnea's Avatar
Dyspnea Dyspnea is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Edmonton,AB
Posts: 161
Dyspnea is on a distinguished road
Default

8 year old thread from the dead...
__________________
My 265 gallon build!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-06-2012, 07:00 AM
rickcasa rickcasa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto
Posts: 42
rickcasa is on a distinguished road
Thumbs up

There's gold in them thar dusty old posts.
As a newbie reefer, I'm just soaking in all these great info.
I'm sure theyre still valid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.