![]() |
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() He has a phillips ballast right now, but It won't fire up a 10,000k so that's why he needs the new ballast. He is also planning on getting rid of the 3 tubes of attinic when he goe's with the upgrade. Any thoughts?
__________________
cheers, Rich all that we do is touched with ocean, yet we remain on the shore of what we know http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/5/aquarium |
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
http://www.reefcentral.com/vbulletin...e&pagenumber=2 My personal preference would be without actinics because I like my white sand to look white. If you prefer the underwater look, then keep the actinics. The extra light will benefit the animals too. |
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Sure, my thoughts are you still haven't answered the questions!! WHY is he going to 10k? Let's assume he has a reason. He will most likley want to keep the actinics. I have 10k, they need actinics. If he has a M59 ballast, it will fire the 10k bulbs. What ansi code is the ballast?
__________________
Brad |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If you want colorful stony coral pink purple blue one word!
Radium ![]() ![]() ![]() if you want softy and lps: light green, solid yellow,and brown saki is the cheapest but need more actinic to give same resutl as 10k |
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Stephane, it's easy to generalize with this sort fo stuff. Strangely enough, one of the most colourful tanks in town is lit by a 400w iwasaki with 2 vho and 2 no 4' actinics.. Though I can't complain about my colour with the radium!
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
![]() No offense, but sometimes I think my lighting is a bit too blue. We are using 2x radiums 400w 20K |
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Jeanna, he's talking about Brad Gemmell's tank. Really nice colors under a 65k.
You should come by and see my tank after my Radiums get delivered. Not too blue at all. Maybe you'll want to switch ballasts!!!
__________________
Brad |