Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Polls

View Poll Results: What is your level of interest in ATS?
Never Heard of it 95 64.63%
Read some, interesting, but I'll stick to my skimmer 31 21.09%
I want one for my tank 16 10.88%
I'm already running one 5 3.40%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:40 PM
fdiddy fdiddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 120
fdiddy is on a distinguished road
Default

My thought is why not have this come off your overflow and possibly flow into your fuge if you're running one already or into your sump. That way you can run a "T" off your overflow and be able to adjust flow into this more easily that with a pump. This would save quite a bit on power. I understand you wont get the same amount of pods or whatever, but IMO the power saved is better than pods, because they'll grow in the tank and eventually get to a healthy level anyways. Just my humble opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-27-2008, 07:03 PM
cvermeulen cvermeulen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Delta
Posts: 11
cvermeulen is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdiddy View Post
My thought is why not have this come off your overflow and possibly flow into your fuge if you're running one already or into your sump. That way you can run a "T" off your overflow and be able to adjust flow into this more easily that with a pump. This would save quite a bit on power. I understand you wont get the same amount of pods or whatever, but IMO the power saved is better than pods, because they'll grow in the tank and eventually get to a healthy level anyways. Just my humble opinion.
This is how mine works on my FW setup. My goal was to add it in without adding another pump - already have to run the bulbs. You could also do this on the return to the tank from your sump if you have room under your canopy, or if you can make a nice slick looking unit that doesn't look out of place sitting atop your tank.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-27-2008, 10:33 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

Wow, some great reading. It's great to see this idea get some revival. I haven't really seen anyone do much with algal turf scrubbing in years. But the idea has merit. I like it.

cvermeulen, do I understand correctly that you are running one on your FW tank?
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-27-2008, 10:38 PM
cvermeulen cvermeulen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Delta
Posts: 11
cvermeulen is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
cvermeulen, do I understand correctly that you are running one on your FW tank?
Yes, I am. It's doing a pretty good job too. There are a few FW success stories on MonsterFishkeepers.com as well. one fellow successfully "ungrew" algae from his whole outdoor pond with a solar powered algae screen.

My only complaint is that I removed my mech. filter bags to make room for the scrubber in my sump, and the filter floss I replaced the bags with don't do nearly as good a job... this of course is easily remedied. It's only a problem in my tank because of it's messy inhabitants.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:29 PM
fdiddy fdiddy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 120
fdiddy is on a distinguished road
Default

I thought this system was a thing of the 70s and had major problems with water discoloration?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-27-2008, 11:36 PM
cvermeulen cvermeulen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Delta
Posts: 11
cvermeulen is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fdiddy View Post
I thought this system was a thing of the 70s and had major problems with water discoloration?
Well it's definitely not NEW technology. I haven't seen any report of water discoloration on either FW or SW applications. I'm not sure why they aren't more predominant in hobbyist aquaria. It's a similar idea to running an autotrophic denitrator with sulfur or alcohol as an energy source (as in some public aquaria). The only issue I can foresee (which is preventable !) is when you do not clean your scrubber for weeks and weeks, and the bottom layers die and begin to decay causing an ammonia spike. There are scrubber designs though that prevent this problem... and realistically can you say it's a system flaw that negiligence causes potential problems?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-28-2008, 11:30 AM
BlueAbyss's Avatar
BlueAbyss BlueAbyss is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Creighton, SK
Posts: 952
BlueAbyss is on a distinguished road
Default

The issue with water discolouration in these systems, as seen in some older reef systems such as the Great Barrier Reef display in the Smithsonian Museum (it was actually really bad in this system from the pictures I looked at) probably stemmed from the fact that this was the only form of filtration used in these systems. I would think that used together with common technologies from today (skimmers, prodigious use of live rock, etc.) this would probably be a non-issue.

And if a little colour was noticed, you could just run some carbon.

Glad to see this idea getting some attention. Seems like a more efficient way to export nutrients than a 'fuge.
__________________
Calvin
---
Planning a 29 gallon mixed reef...
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-28-2008, 03:02 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAbyss View Post
The issue with water discolouration in these systems, as seen in some older reef systems such as the Great Barrier Reef display in the Smithsonian Museum (it was actually really bad in this system from the pictures I looked at) probably stemmed from the fact that this was the only form of filtration used in these systems. I would think that used together with common technologies from today (skimmers, prodigious use of live rock, etc.) this would probably be a non-issue.

And if a little colour was noticed, you could just run some carbon.

Glad to see this idea getting some attention. Seems like a more efficient way to export nutrients than a 'fuge.
Well said.
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-29-2008, 03:14 AM
Reef_Craze's Avatar
Reef_Craze Reef_Craze is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 17
Reef_Craze is on a distinguished road
Default

i set one up a couple weeks back using the spray bar from a Rena canister filter. i recommend one for anybody having nitrate trouble.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-29-2008, 03:47 AM
don.ald's Avatar
don.ald don.ald is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Victoria
Posts: 719
don.ald is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reef_Craze View Post
i set one up a couple weeks back using the spray bar from a Rena canister filter. i recommend one for anybody having nitrate trouble.
any pics or designs to share would be great
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
algae, ats, scrubber, turf

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.