Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-27-2010, 05:56 PM
hillegom hillegom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,996
hillegom is on a distinguished road
Default Does a RO, filter out chloramines?

I know the carbon in a RO filter will take out the chlorine that is in the water, but without a DI, will the chloramines (NH2Cl) also be taken out?
I have a RO/DI but my brother who has fresh water fish, only has an RO.

Sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) will dechorinate the water, but it leaves the ammonia behind. I do not want that.

Any chemists feel like chiming in?

I guess that you could always buy a complete conditioner, but I was looking for something more DIY

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-27-2010, 09:15 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

sure hope so as that's all I use.
__________________
my tank
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-27-2010, 10:18 PM
mike31154's Avatar
mike31154 mike31154 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vernon
Posts: 2,073
mike31154 will become famous soon enough
Default

Not a chemist, but if not mistaken, most RO systems designed to handle chloramines have an extra carbon stage before the membrane. Both chlorine and chloramine will destroy your membrane in short order, the DI has nothing to do with removing either since it's downstream of the RO membrane. Don't know if there's anything special about the extra carbon stage. I believe my BWI system is rated for chloramines since it has the extra carbon stage. So my config is 1 micron poly pre-filter, re-fillable carbon stage, 0.5 micron 'chlorine guzzler' carbon block, RO and finally DI. In my case it doesn't really matter since I know that my source water is treated with chlorine only, not chloramine. I've been considering dumping the first carbon stage and replacing it with another poly pre-filter, say one 5 micron, then a 1 micron, then the carbon block.
__________________
Mike
77g sumpless SW
DIY 10 watt multi-chip LED build http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82206
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-27-2010, 10:23 PM
Doug's Avatar
Doug Doug is offline
Rest In Peace
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kamloops BC
Posts: 4,920
Doug has disabled reputation
Default

I would think Mark & Mike are on the money. Does carbon not remove them? I run a 5m, 1m, then my carbon filter before the membrane and also a post carbon. I also plan on switching the first stage 5m for a 5m carbon impregnated filter.

My membrane made 4 yrs. so must be doing something correct.
__________________
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-27-2010, 11:09 PM
mike31154's Avatar
mike31154 mike31154 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vernon
Posts: 2,073
mike31154 will become famous soon enough
Default

This thread got me wanting more info on the subject of chloramines. Here's a link to a fairly good read. No idea how reliable or factual, but seems legit (Citizens Concerned About Chloramine, San Fran Bay Area, Cali) . Scary stuff actually, both chlorine and chloramines. Chlorine does seem to at least have the advantage that it will dissipate on its own if water is left standing in an open container for a sufficient amount of time.

According to one quote in the article, the RO membrane does actually remove one component of chloramine after the carbon stage.... and a DI filter would work as well, part of it anyhow. I think most of us use mixed bed DI media, cations and anions. The cation part will remove ammonia.

"To remove chloramine, an extensive carbon filter (to remove the chlorine part of the chloramine molecule) followed by a reverse osmosis or cation filter (to remove the ammonia) is necessary."

http://www.chloramine.org/chloraminefacts.htm
__________________
Mike
77g sumpless SW
DIY 10 watt multi-chip LED build http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82206
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-28-2010, 04:34 AM
hillegom hillegom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,996
hillegom is on a distinguished road
Default

Mike31154 that is a very good and scary article about chloramines. I didn't know they were that bad.
If I remember correctly, I think I read, a few years ago that Surrey was going to use chloramines. or was it the GVRD?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.