![]() |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Is it SPS or LPS?
__________________
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i did a google search some say sps couple say lps . doh!!
http://www.yourreef.com/corals/sps-c...a-decadia.html Last edited by wreck; 12-12-2013 at 01:50 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() It's LPs I can grow it at a par of 75 I can't do that with sps
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Its an SPS. Cant really understand why it would be pointed as lps. And one cant judge coral by par value. I keep my mr. Packman at the same lighting level as acans but that doesnt make it an lps.
__________________
You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob ![]() |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm thinking that since the polyps are small, kind of the criteria for SPS, I'm going with SPS.
__________________
Brad |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() That's just what I thought there's all the cryterya for lps
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() i have always considered it an LPS. very hardy, don't need or like much light, I have have never had one RTN. Not sure what the book says on it.
__________________
I'm out. ![]() |
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I always thought it was an sps! Because of the smaller polyps.
-Tony Last edited by thmh; 12-12-2013 at 03:54 PM. |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() They are in the family Faviidae. So an LPS
![]() |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() |