|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
lens question
I'm looking for a lense for my canon T2i, I was told to grab this one..
http://www.londondrugs.com/Cultures/...1&ProductTab=3 But I know I really want to try my luck with some macro pics and was wondering if this might be the better choice? http://www.londondrugs.com/Cultures/...2&ProductTab=3 Any advise on either lense or even recomend something different possibly? thanks in advance!!
__________________
http://plentyoffishandcoral.proboards.com/index.cgi |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
this one: canon 100mm macro lens or this one: canon 60 mm macro |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
I'd get this one
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...ns-Review.aspx But the T2i isn't a full frame camera though.
__________________
It all started with ............. "Finding Nemo" |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
That's why there's the 60mm macro lens. It is meant for non full frame camera ONLY. That's a nice lens too but pricy for something you'd likely use infrequently. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
The nifty fifty (the first lens you posted) is a staple lens, if you dont have it already, buy it. It takes amazing pictures for the minimal price. You will get many years of use out of it.
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
50mm are pretty good prime lenses, especially for portrait style pics. The two lenses are similar but the macro has a closer focusing distance hence making macro (1:1 magnification) possible. The macro is also slower at 2.5 vs 1.8 which won't really matter for macro as in most cases you'll want more DOF but it will lack some of the ability to minimize DOF and increase shutter that you sometimes want with a portrait lens. So although similar they are geared towards different things. Personally I think a 50mm is too small for a macro and you'll find yourself having to get too very close to the subject for a real macro. You really need two lenses, the 50mm 1.8 (or 1.4 even better) and the 100mm macro.
Last edited by sphelps; 02-20-2012 at 03:43 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|