![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Making plans for an upgrade to a 230g and wondering if you could from the start, would you go with a closed loop set-up(looks clean, but not movable or quality good performance powerhead pumps, movable & bulky (eg Tunze) I find pros and cons with either way, so looking for what others think. Alternating high flow is what I'm really after of coarse. Let the debate begin
![]()
__________________
Mike 150g reef, 55g sump, T5's, Vertech 200A, Profilux III - German made is highly over rated, should just say Gerpan made. Reefkeeper - individual obsessed with placing disturbing amounts of electricity and seawater in close proximity for the purpose of maintaining live coral reef organisms. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm going with closed loops with my new tank. One closed loop through the bottom of the tank and one over the top. I'll most likely have an Ocean Motions 4-Way on one of the closed loops. I prefer the clean look without seeing equipment.
__________________
Robb |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() If doing a CL, can design so returns aren't noticable (see OM picture forum), something a little harder with PH unless using something like a Tunze rock.
PH and CL can both also give noise. Might get a overall higher flow with PHs than a external pump for the same noise level if not running a separate fish room (do find my Dart though ok for being under the tank). My tanks been up for a couple years with a CL and still no regrets. |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Both can be good, in general for larger tanks a closed loop can be a cheaper alternative. Here's one I did on a custom 270 gallon:
![]() ![]() Pump outputs were placed through the bottom pane and the inputs on the back to avoid sucking in sand. Also I went with two inputs rather than one single to reduce the suction velocity. I also installed a 4-Way OM and mounted it sideways over the sump for easy maintenance which is key for such a system, you need lots of space otherwise it's just a headache waiting to happen. ![]() The outputs where covered with rock using some zip-ties . ![]() ![]() So you do get a clean look with the closed loop, but it will probably use more power than a tunze setup. However a tunze setup is going to cost a little more but if you plan ahead you can generate a clean look this these powerheads as well. I've always liked the idea of making your tank a little wider and building an acrylic curtain in the back and placing the tunzes behind the curtain alowing only the nozzles to penetrate into the visible tank area through strategically placed holes. A tunze setup will also give you more control and better alternating flow. In my tank I use both, a closed loop to produce the majority of the flow rate and a tunze to provide a short right angled wave and better water alteration. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() WOW, awesome looking setup
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Are closed loops *really* a cheap alternative? Seems to me when you start getting into the >2000gph range, the DC drive motors (Tunze, Korallia, Vortech, etc. etc. e-i-e-i-o) edge out the inline pumps...
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|