Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Marine Fish

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:33 PM
rocksteveo rocksteveo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: coquitlam
Posts: 81
rocksteveo is an unknown quantity at this point
Default stock limit?

any thoughts on my fish stock?
the tank is a 110g tall with 30 gal sump, coralife 220 skimmer ,refugium with 2 types of macro algea. 100lbs of live rock, 2x korilla pumps,tunze nano wavebox, 2x 48" reef ready led lights.
my fish:
perc clown
tomato clown
6x chromis
six line wrasse
lemonpeel
flame
ebli
2x yellow gobys
tomini tang 3''
naso tang 4''
sixbar angel 4''
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2012, 11:57 PM
Ryan's Avatar
Ryan Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lethbridge, AB
Posts: 1,214
Ryan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Ryan
Default

Judging by your choice of skimmer I would say your over stocked. I would upgrade the skimmer but otherwise it looks okay.
__________________
Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:14 AM
MKLKT MKLKT is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 261
MKLKT is on a distinguished road
Default

I've got about the same level of stock minus the tangs in 65 gal with a 20 sump and CL125 and it's great, but you will be on the upper side of stocking, especially as they grow.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:43 AM
rocksteveo rocksteveo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: coquitlam
Posts: 81
rocksteveo is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

the skimmer is rated for a 220gal, no good? what would be a good choice without spending a mortage payment on one?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2012, 01:41 AM
Wayne's Avatar
Wayne Wayne is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 938
Wayne is on a distinguished road
Default

220 is for a mild stocked tank. Yours is depending on if you have corals (judging by the angels not much) you are on the heavier side.

A lot of people recommend Vertex Skimmers for a good-bang-for-buck.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2012, 03:29 AM
Ryan's Avatar
Ryan Ryan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lethbridge, AB
Posts: 1,214
Ryan is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Ryan
Default

I have a vertex IN-180 and love it. Its what I would reccomend.

The Coralife is rated for 220 but its not designed very well. I would say it would be better suited on a 55-75 tank but even then there are better skimners out there for the same money.
__________________
Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2012, 03:37 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

I have to agree with the guys above and I'll add that a lot of the lower end skimmers are over-rated.
You would definately do better with a higher-end skimmer rated above your tank size. You don't have to spend thousands.
A good skimmer new for you would be $350-450 for say a Vertex or a Skimz. Even an SWC.
Just buy bigger than rated for most and you will be fine.
And stay away from the Coralife stuff with a tank your size.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:19 PM
rocksteveo rocksteveo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: coquitlam
Posts: 81
rocksteveo is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

thank you all
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-25-2012, 11:30 PM
Seriak's Avatar
Seriak Seriak is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Posts: 954
Seriak is on a distinguished road
Default

You could look at a BM NAC7 skimmer. They are getting good reviews lately.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.