Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > Other > Lounge

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2010, 12:33 PM
Snaz's Avatar
Snaz Snaz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 1,034
Snaz is on a distinguished road
Unhappy RIP Wetlands of Louisiana

http://www.google.ca/search?q=louisi...ed=0CBIQsQQwAA

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetlands_of_Louisiana
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2010, 03:25 PM
hillegom hillegom is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,996
hillegom is on a distinguished road
Default

Unfortunately, we are too dependent on oil to stop all the drilling/transport of oil in the world. This is not the first "spill" nor the last.
No matter where the contamination, all living creatures are adversely affected.
I have read previously that those swamplands were in trouble before this latest worse problem
I hope they get most of the oil cleaned up before it hits shore.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2010, 04:39 PM
4lti7ude's Avatar
4lti7ude 4lti7ude is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 133
4lti7ude is on a distinguished road
Default

Holy ****.
Thats gonna mess up some life out there for sure.

How are they going to clean all this up??
I dont think the way they do it in the oceans is gonna work this time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2010, 05:25 PM
belzebuth belzebuth is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 207
belzebuth is on a distinguished road
Default

This is terrible. The eco system in this area will probably never recover.
__________________
Andy
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-30-2010, 06:22 PM
Zoaelite's Avatar
Zoaelite Zoaelite is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,461
Zoaelite is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
President Obama said Friday that responsibility for the cleanup rests with BP, the owner of the lease, but that the government would assist communities affected.
Another reason I don't like Obama, stop pointing fingers and get it fixed. The US government makes billions of dollars on oil per year and they have problems spending a fraction of that to fixing "the oil company's" problems.

6. U.S. crude oil production in March 2010: 5,532,000 b/d (of which 688,000 b/d was
Alaskan) (March 2009: 5,472,000 b/d). U.S. production of natural gas liquids in March
2010: 1,849,000 b/d (March 2009: 1,850,000 b/d). [API]
7. U.S. marketed natural gas production in January 2010: 61.0 billion cubic feet per day
(January 2009: 60.4 billion cf/d). [DOE]
-http://www.api.org/statistics

Now considering that, this is what states pay per gallon in cents on gas products. We are not talking about any small amount of money.



It's this type of destruction based on the dollar that's ruining our planet, government has far to much investment to be a true representation of our needs and we are definably not the only thing on the Earth with needs.

En-light of sounding like Cornelius Cardew from the Shooting Party I will stop my rant now... lol

Last edited by Zoaelite; 04-30-2010 at 06:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-30-2010, 11:55 PM
intarsiabox intarsiabox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sherwood Park
Posts: 1,419
intarsiabox is on a distinguished road
Default

The US government would only hire the same private outfits that the oil company would. The oil company makes billions in profits, the US government is trillions in debt. They don't have any money to fix anything, they spent it all bailing out greedy banks and securing their oil supply in Iraq (oh, meant to say saving the people of Iraq not oil).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-01-2010, 12:36 AM
hillbillyreefer hillbillyreefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central, AB
Posts: 471
hillbillyreefer is on a distinguished road
Default

Only about 35% of the crude is turned into motor fuels. US production does not meet demand, and much of their crude is imported. In case people didn't know natural gas and gasoline are not even close to being the same thing. Just to help clarify an above post.

This accident could lead to widespread damage in the ecosystem. It's going to cost BP billions to clean this one up. They need to make big profits because there is big risk involved in their business. The chance of a blowout is one of those risks.

Why is it I've heard far more reports about the ecosystem, and costs of this accident, than the 11 souls that were lost in the accident. RIP.

Everyone of us is partly responsible for this accident. We ALL use fossil fuels.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-06-2010, 04:54 AM
Diana's Avatar
Diana Diana is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North Vancouver, BC
Posts: 550
Diana is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes we all do. 100%. But what we need to realize is we don't HAVE to. We don't HAVE to live in cities. We can grow our own food and use alternative fuels & methods to produce energy. We can all together avoid plastics and other products that use fuels. There are people that do it:

http://urbanhomestead.org/journal/

If we continue to live in our modern day society, which most of us will, then we need to take our usage waaaayyyy back. It is possible- quit waiting for the future. If we don't do it now then we might as well enjoy our environment while it lasts, because we will be the last generation to experience it. We are poisoning our planet and ourselves.


-Diana
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2010, 03:37 PM
FitoPharmer FitoPharmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 454
FitoPharmer is on a distinguished road
Default

So sad.
http://www.businessinsider.com/who-d...-mexico-2010-6
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.