Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:14 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default What's better, one large tank (180g) or two medium tanks (90g) ?

So I know that I either want to upgrade my current 90 gallon mixed reef to a 180 gallon and close down the 90 gallon, or set up a new 90 gallon sps coral only tank. There are lots of pros and cons for going either way and I think I have thought out most of them, but I figured maybe some open discussion and other opinions would be good.

My personal reasonings have broken it down to two main points.. I like the idea of having two tanks in case one fails. Kind of like a backup. The old don't keep all your eggs in one basket cliche. Over the past week I have ready through tonnes of build threads and have seen some horror stories.. I suppose it is possible that both tanks will fail but hopefully not at the same time! I don't like two tanks because then I have to maintain them both and there is a lot of duplication, potentially costlier, more maintenance ? Anyway, I am conflicted. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:25 PM
naesco's Avatar
naesco naesco is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: vancouver
Posts: 1,747
naesco is on a distinguished road
Default u

Quote:
Originally Posted by kien View Post
So I know that I either want to upgrade my current 90 gallon mixed reef to a 180 gallon and close down the 90 gallon, or set up a new 90 gallon sps coral only tank. There are lots of pros and cons for going either way and I think I have thought out most of them, but I figured maybe some open discussion and other opinions would be good.

My personal reasonings have broken it down to two main points.. I like the idea of having two tanks in case one fails. Kind of like a backup. The old don't keep all your eggs in one basket cliche. Over the past week I have ready through tonnes of build threads and have seen some horror stories.. I suppose it is possible that both tanks will fail but hopefully not at the same time! I don't like two tanks because then I have to maintain them both and there is a lot of duplication, potentially costlier, more maintenance ? Anyway, I am conflicted. Thoughts?
A quality properly installed tank will last a lifetime.
IMO,Always choose the largest tank that you can afford (and fit in your residence).
For example, the 180 provides room for some of the most beautiful angelfish and most of the tangs.
However, if a reefer decides that he would like to start up a species tank because he has a high interest in a certain species, that is a different decision.

Last edited by christyf5; 06-19-2009 at 05:05 PM. Reason: fixed quote
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:40 PM
banditpowdercoat's Avatar
banditpowdercoat banditpowdercoat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 100 mile hse BC
Posts: 2,568
banditpowdercoat is on a distinguished road
Default

1 larger tank better, IMPO Can fit larger fish, and less work. Cleaning, scraping coraline. Spent 3 hrs last night just scraping and cleaning my 45g. I left the coraline WAY to long
__________________
Dan Pesonen


Umm, a tank or 5
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2009, 04:41 PM
Leah Leah is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Penticton B.C.
Posts: 2,142
Leah is on a distinguished road
Default

If I had it to do all over again I'd do one large tank having said that though I have one tank set up with angels, and I have my reef tank as well. But it is alot to maintain 3ish seperate tanks. I never stop with the upkeep. So I think you need to decide what you want to put into it first and then decide what way to go.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2009, 05:01 PM
michika's Avatar
michika michika is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YYC
Posts: 5,063
michika is on a distinguished road
Default

How about this idea then, combine the best of both worlds.

Do one big tank, and you can set up a feature around a divider to create two separate sides of your tank which are inaccessible to fish etc. So you'd essentially have the two different tanks you want, but only have the maintenance to do one one single system.

This is a lot cooler on paper, and very non-cool when you read it though.
__________________
+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+
I glue animals to rocks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2009, 05:07 PM
christyf5's Avatar
christyf5 christyf5 is offline
Staff
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 9,175
christyf5 is on a distinguished road
Default

I'd do one large, gives you the opportunity to have bigger and a wider variety of fish.

That "eggs in one basket thing" doesn't really apply. If one tank crashes, it still sucks just as hard

LOL I don't know how many of my non-fish friends are asking if I'm keeping my 90 when I set up my 180. I just give them this horrified look. I can't imagine how people do more than one big tank. It gives me a headache just thinking about it
__________________
Christy's Reef Blog

My 180 Build

Every electronic component is shipped with smoke stored deep inside.... only a real genius can find a way to set it free.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2009, 06:31 PM
whatcaneyedo's Avatar
whatcaneyedo whatcaneyedo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 2,198
whatcaneyedo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to whatcaneyedo
Default

Between my 3 tanks and 2 sumps I've got over 300gal of saltwater... I'd much rather have a 225gal with a 75gal sump. The only advantage to having many small tanks is so that you can keep things that arent compatible. I was able to save 4 acans, an open brain, a donut coral, a christmas tree worm rock, and a photosynthetic sea whip all from being eaten by my copperbanded butterfly by moving them to one of my other tanks. Also its easier to move smaller tanks down stairs and through narrow hallways...
__________________
"We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever." - H.P. Lovecraft

Old 120gal Tank Journal
New 225gal Tank Journal
May 2010 TOTM
The 10th Annual Prince George Reef Tank Tour
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2009, 07:55 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I agree with the compatibility points, that's why I've always run multiple tanks myself. At one point it was advantageous for me to have at least one system that was completely separated from the others, because of the potential for fish kill (I had a 24" diameter ritteri anemone which could kill off an entire tank full of fish if something annoyed it .. it would just release something that would cause the fish to die within minutes. Happened to me a few times and it was a terrible traumatic experience so I mitigated the risks by putting it in a tank by itself, a dedicated species setup.) I don't have the anemone anymore, sold it, but the legacy of the multiple tanks lives on.

Which brings me to the second point, 2 systems is twice the maintenance work, and so on. In the wintertime, when we're housebound anyhow, it might be less of a concern but in the summertime with vacations and outside experiences taking precendence it's easy to fall off the wagon and it's amazing how quick tanks can go from "A+" to "C-". In reefkeeping, if everything is OK, things can be amazingly low maintenance. But as soon as one thing gets off balance, it can be fairly easy for the house of cards to collapse.

But if you run two tanks off one sump, at least you can leverage the equipment factor. Instead of two so-so skimmers you can afford one really nice one, and so on. but then you're still stuck with the "all eggs in one basket" scenario.

But bigger systems buffer against problems better than smaller systems, so it might lessen the need for redundancy some.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:30 PM
kien's Avatar
kien kien is offline
¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸¸. ><(((º>
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 7,665
kien will become famous soon enoughkien will become famous soon enough
Default

Thanks for all the input! I don't think I have a specific need for a species tank. The more I think about it, the less keen I feel about having to maintain multiple tanks. It is enough to maintain the display and the sump! One big tank it is then. You made a very good point at lunch today Tony.. you can easily spread yourself too thin by having to maintain multiple tanks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:43 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

You could always put your sump in the basement and run the 90g as a way wicked refugium.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.