Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-26-2003, 08:05 AM
1bigstud's Avatar
1bigstud 1bigstud is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, bc
Posts: 238
1bigstud is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to 1bigstud
Default help uprading from 33 to 50 gallons

Hello everyone I was thinking about upgrading my current setup which is a 33 gallon to a 50 gallon. I plan on using my 33 gallon as the sump for the fifty. I do however have a few questions and would love all the advice I can get
1. I was planning to make 25 gallons of new water for the fifty then over a week or so adding 25 gallons from my 33 will this work or will it destroy my cycle??
2. I have two 45 watt actinic bulbs and two 55 flourescent bulbs and plan on keeping soft corals and anenomes is this enough light??? ( i will be getting a custom hood lined with reflective material made.
3. will 90 pounds of live rock be enough for both the sump(33) and reef(50)
4. How much sand will I need???
As well I am looking for the following items a
return pump
live sand
power heads.

Once again any suggestions, advice SUGGESTIVE critiscism is greatly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-26-2003, 02:33 PM
Jedi68 Jedi68 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 58
Jedi68 is on a distinguished road
Default

You got email...
I can help you with live sand and powerheads.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-26-2003, 02:54 PM
Troy F's Avatar
Troy F Troy F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Surrey, B.C.
Posts: 1,158
Troy F is on a distinguished road
Default

Let's just call you "One". Your lighting is fine for many soft corals but depending on the type of anemones you'd like to keep, your lighting won't be enough (ignore this comment if you're talking about mushrooms). I think you have plenty of rock for both tanks.

As for a return pump, I'd go with an external and bigger than you think you need. You can split the return a couple of times thus cutting down or elimanating the need for power heads.
__________________
Troy

lusus naturae
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-26-2003, 05:19 PM
Quinn Quinn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,305
Quinn is on a distinguished road
Default

if you're going bigger, why not go significantly bigger, like a 75 gal up top or something? if you're going to do the work, you may as well...
__________________
-Quinn

Man, n. ...His chief occupation is extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth, and Canada. - A. Bierce, Devil's Dictionary, 1906
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-26-2003, 06:59 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teevee
if you're going bigger, why not go significantly bigger, like a 75 gal up top or something? if you're going to do the work, you may as well...
A 75 requires more lights, more rock, more salt, more electricity, more more more.
I think going to a 50 is a nice step while keeping the equipment you have.
You can also stock the 50 for less than the 75. This way you can have a really nice reef without going broke. Bigger is not always better!!
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-26-2003, 08:13 PM
AJ_77's Avatar
AJ_77 AJ_77 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 2,772
AJ_77 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reef_raf
I think going to a 50 is a nice step while keeping the equipment you have. You can also stock the 50 for less than the 75. This way you can have a really nice reef without going broke. Bigger is not always better!!
I'm with Brad on this one. I went from a 33 to a 50 and it was pretty straighforward. Needed some more sand and rock, but used everything else including lights. The dimensions are way better than the 33, and just a little more cost and work to maintain.

I find a 50 to be an ideal size. (Talk to me again in a year.)
__________________
----------------------
Alan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-26-2003, 08:15 PM
Canadian Man's Avatar
Canadian Man Canadian Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,550
Canadian Man is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by reef_raf
Quote:
Originally Posted by teevee
if you're going bigger, why not go significantly bigger, like a 75 gal up top or something? if you're going to do the work, you may as well...
A 75 requires more lights, more rock, more salt, more electricity, more more more.
I think going to a 50 is a nice step while keeping the equipment you have.
You can also stock the 50 for less than the 75. This way you can have a really nice reef without going broke. Bigger is not always better!!
Good point Brad!
__________________
No matter what the morrow brings, inventors keep inventing things.
-----------------------------------
Jonathan
-----------------------------------
www.cakerybakery.ca
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-26-2003, 10:33 PM
1bigstud's Avatar
1bigstud 1bigstud is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Richmond, bc
Posts: 238
1bigstud is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to 1bigstud
Default

Guys thanks alot for all the advice and responses
This site rocks I find everyone on here to be so friendly and helpful/
I think I will make the jump from 33 to fifty.

I'll keep you all posted
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.