![]() |
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I'm thinking of going this direction with my system, these products have been around awhile now, feedback by actual user's?
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Talking with Jeff at J&L I would go with Zeo. He has used both and says Zeo actually made a difference in his system, and also costs less in the long run.
I have been running PolypLabs for about 5 months now, and I haven't really noticed any difference. I am discontinuing when my current supply runs out.
__________________
250 BB Starphire SPS, clams, & zoos 3 x 250 DE, IC 660 W/T5s OM 4-way, Hammerhead Pump Calcium, Kalk, RO filters, magnesium, Excellent prices |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Zeo > Polylab.
__________________
This and that. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() i did quite a bit of reading of old posts on this a while recently, and it appears that zeo is the way to go. i dont like the idea of this bacterial film that sludges your tank that some people are reporting using polyp lab, and people are also reporting bad effects when stopping using it. the idea of the zeo reactor and that giving the bacteria somewhere to grow seems the way to go to me. so because of that i have ordered 12' of acrylic pipe today and i am starting to build reactors.
__________________
If it is alive, I can most certainly kill it |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I have used both. I used polyplab for 5-6 months and saw some growth in my SPS with no effects when I stopped (but did not stop cold turkey). I have been using zeo for >1 month and think the growth is probably better. My tank parameters have deteriorated when starting the zeo. My PO4 went from 0.01 to 0.10 with some hair algae growth. However, the PO4 is improving. I would go with zeo, although obtaining a reactor is a pain.
p.s. it is difficult to keep the reactor full of water when it is turned off. You are supposed to turn it on and off every three hours initially while your nutrients are high. This usually involves some form of modification.
__________________
300 gal starphire custom built in pentagon reef (+90 gal sump on Blue Line 100 HD return pump, 210lb LR, Euro-Reef RC250 skimmer, 2x400W MH, 2x28W compacts, 2xTurbelle classic 4002 pumps & Turbelle Stream 6100 on 7095 Multicontroller, running ZEOvit) Livestock Fish: damsels; sailfin, yellow, regal & naso tangs; ocellaris & tomato clowns; lyretail anthias; foxface lo; flame angelfish corals: a few |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Ultra Lith by Fauna marine has done wonders for my tank!!!! OA sells the stuff,. his tank is on this product aswell. My color and growth has improved big time.
__________________
Gerad White Rock |
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() THANKS EVERYONE! I think I will go Zeo in the near future. I want to still upgrade & tweek the set-up of my system & add more live rock (correction; replace some of my !@#$ rock with some cherry-grade).
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() You can always toss that !@#$ rock in my sump...lol.
Scott |
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Reason: to many additives in ZEO system, UL is simpler. I did see good colors and growth with UL ZEO just too sensitive and more complicated. However i think these to products are very similar and because our tanks are SOoooo different there is really no way to say what is the best. I will keep ZEO for 6 month and the decide. OA is a long way from me so this is the only reason i will stay with Zeo for now. . |
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() I may take you up on that...
![]() |