Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2004, 06:48 PM
reefnut reefnut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: kamloops
Posts: 127
reefnut is on a distinguished road
Default calcium at 345 ppm

well ive been using kents liquid reactor to try to get my calcium up around 440 but it just wont work.ive been following the directions on the bottle that say to add 5ml a day until you reach your target.According to the bottle one ml per gallon will add about 33 ppm of calcium.over the last week ive added the equivalent to 2 ml per gallon and no increase at all in calcium.but there is a thin white film now covering all my rock and sand.is this suppose to dissolve over the next few weeks and then my calcium will rise.

33 gal
60 watts t5 +55 watts pc
20 lbs lr
20 pounds crushed coral
3 cleaner shrimps
one green clown goby
one firefish
about 3 snail + 3 hermits
lees air driven skimmer
about 150 gallons flow
some macro

any ideas why my calcium wont rise.my alk is around 11.2 dkh and my ph is at 8.2.Amonia,nitrite and nitrate are almost undetectable.and my sg is sitting at .024.

Thanks in advance for any help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2004, 06:54 PM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

Just a thought, I had a test kit that would not go above 320. Bought a new one and my CA was super high. Might want to try a new test kit.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2004, 07:03 PM
reefnut reefnut is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: kamloops
Posts: 127
reefnut is on a distinguished road
Default

well im using the aquarium systems sea test calcium test kit.anyone ever had problems with these tests.funny thing is is that my nutrafin test is telling me that im at 480 ppm for calcium.but i thought that the seatest was a better more accurate test?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2004, 07:23 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I'm not sure how Aquarium Systems fit in the ratings spectrum but generally I've heard good things about Salifert, also but to a smaller degree Seachem. I used Seachem for many years until they changed their reagents and it became impossible to read (far too dim of a colour tint), so I switched to Salifert and have been very happy with those.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2004, 07:27 PM
monza monza is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cowtown
Posts: 679
monza is on a distinguished road
Default

I use the Salfert (sp?) they are generally good, the first one was bad. I took it back and exchanged it for a new one. I'd say your test kit with the higher results is correct. I tested my kit by testing water dripping right out of my CA reactor and it still read 320. You could make a super consentrated test with tank water and your additive. I bet it'll come out at what ever it was topping out at before.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2004, 01:49 AM
martym's Avatar
martym martym is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Surrey,Bc
Posts: 578
martym is on a distinguished road
Default

Test your magnisium. I had the same trouble, only to find that there wasn't enough mag. in the water the help the calcium. It's all about balance.
__________________
Marty
50g reef, bubble king skimmer,20g sump,zeovit system, PM cal reactor
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2004, 02:26 PM
danny zubot's Avatar
danny zubot danny zubot is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Castlegar BC
Posts: 3,469
danny zubot is on a distinguished road
Default reply

Reefnut said:
Quote:
.but there is a thin white film now covering all my rock and sand.
That white film is a precipitate caused by the calcium additive, most likely too much CA+. I'm not an expert on the relationship between CA+ and magnesium etc but I would venture to say that they're out of balance. IMO, if you want to get eveything balanced do a large water change before your corals start to suffer.
__________________
THE BARQUARIUM:
55 gallon cube - 50 lbs LR - ASM G3 skimmer - 30 Gallon sump - 22 Gallon refugium / frag tank - 4x 24 watt HO T5's - Mag 9.5 return - Pin Point PH monitor - 400 watt XM 20K MH in Lumenarc reflector - Dual stage GFO/NO3 media reactor - 6 stage RODI auto top up -Wavemaster Pro running 3 Koralia 2's.

Fully stocked with fish, corals and usually some fine scotch
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=55041
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2004, 03:52 PM
Fish's Avatar
Fish Fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Okotoks, AB
Posts: 724
Fish is on a distinguished road
Default

This doesn't answer your question about how to raise your calcium but, is there a problem with having a level of 345? (I really don't know)
I'd guess that 480 is higher than what would be found in nature. You didn't mention what corals you have or if you keep clams or heavy calcium consumers but I would suspect that a stable level is more important than a magic number. Just trying to save you some hassle and money - I might be totally wrong though

- Chad
__________________
Returning to the hobby after an eight year absence.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-31-2004, 04:04 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I agree with Chad. A stable value that's "not bad" is better for good growth than a "good" value that's a "peak value." Mind you 345 is probably a little low still, NSW is what, about 390? But if you can do a stable 390 with say 3.9meq/l (roughly 11-12 dKH) that would actually be "better" than say peak values of 450&4.5meq/l. Unfortunately with any kind of additive the trend is going to be more of a "sawtooth effect" (i.e., sudden rise when you add the stuff, then a steady decline as it gets used up). Whereas with a calcium reactor it is to be tuned to add it back at the same rate it is used up, thus giving steady unwavering levels. So unfortunately it's a hefty investment, but it's one of the best investments you can make for your tank if you have heavy consumers of Ca and Alk (which in fact is most things, even softeys make use of these).
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:21 PM
props props is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 590
props is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to props Send a message via MSN to props
Default

where in surrey are you at? you could bring a sample of your water to my house and test it.. or i can lend you my test kit
__________________
Jesse
http://www.canreef.com/ftotm/may06a/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.