Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > DIY

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2010, 12:34 AM
mytank90 mytank90 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: calgary
Posts: 156
mytank90 is on a distinguished road
Default water topoff

i am getting tired of haveing reset my skimmer and haveing salinity move around and looking to get a topoff system going .thinking i will try the tunze one .i have enough room for roughly a 10 gallon tank if custum build or i could buy a 5.5 gallon one from self .would bigger one be better or does size realy matter for topoff ?also do you need run a small wave maker in one to keep water moveing?right now i loss about 3 to 4 gallons a week to evaporation
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-30-2010, 06:01 AM
whatcaneyedo's Avatar
whatcaneyedo whatcaneyedo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 2,198
whatcaneyedo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to whatcaneyedo
Default

Some people have problems with the Tunze Osmolator pumps from time to time but I've been using one for a few years and never had an issue with it. They're a great system in my opinion. There are also plenty of threads on this site about ATO systems so do a search and decide for yourself if a Tunze is right for you or if you want to save some money and do something simpler.

The larger your freshwater container the less often you'll have to top it off... thats the only difference I can think of.

There is no reason to have a circulation pump in your freshwater container.
__________________
"We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever." - H.P. Lovecraft

Old 120gal Tank Journal
New 225gal Tank Journal
May 2010 TOTM
The 10th Annual Prince George Reef Tank Tour

Last edited by whatcaneyedo; 07-30-2010 at 06:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-30-2010, 06:12 AM
mike31154's Avatar
mike31154 mike31154 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vernon
Posts: 2,073
mike31154 will become famous soon enough
Default

Gravity feed with a mechanical float valve is the simplest, if you have the room to hide the container, or if having it visible above the sump is not a problem. As far as the size of the top off container, the only caution I would add is, if there's any kind of shut off valve failure, you run the risk of dumping too much fresh water into your system too quickly. Since you only lose 3-4 gal per week, I'd say a 5 gal container would be a good starting point.
__________________
Mike
77g sumpless SW
DIY 10 watt multi-chip LED build http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82206
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2010, 09:18 PM
jostafew's Avatar
jostafew jostafew is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Abbotsford, BC
Posts: 185
jostafew is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm running a hyrbid ATO system using the JBJ controller, a 12vDC power supply and the pump from the Tunze osmolator (all innexpensive). Works awesome. Bought the JBJ controller used and has been running for 6 months without any problems (I know some people have complained about reliability problems with JBJ ATO).

I have a comment on the post above; mechanical & gravity fed is the simplest, but eventually all systems fail and I'd be worried about failure (flooding) in a gravity fed system. Atleast in an electricly pumped system it's most likely method of failure is to not work at all....

As for the FW resevoir size, it's simply a matter of how often you want to be refilling it. Larger the better as you won't have to fill it as often. Sounds like you know how much water you're losing, so you can decide how often you want to fill the resevoir. My one comment there would be to have better than a week's water in there so that you can go on vacation without having to worry about water top up.

If I understand correctly you're considering using a wavemaker in the FW resevoir? I really wouldn't see the point there... There's next to nothing in the RO/DI water to go stagnant, and oxigination's hardly a concern as there should be nothing living in there anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2010, 09:38 PM
lastlight's Avatar
lastlight lastlight is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,997
lastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura about
Default

And if you go the Tunze route please make sure your topoff line is not submerged. After it's done it's first dose you could potentially back-siphon a lot of water into your reservoir!
__________________
Brett
My 67 392 225 101 94 34 97 404 28 93 209 gallon reef.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-30-2010, 09:58 PM
BlueTang<3's Avatar
BlueTang<3 BlueTang<3 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Stony Plain, Alberta
Posts: 1,641
BlueTang<3 is on a distinguished road
Default

Make sure that the hose is higher that the bucket it comes out of. I made that mistake got a good deal on a 20X20x40 inch tank but had the top off to the sump could not break syphon.
__________________
360 gallon sps reef, 180 gal sump, bubble king supermarine 300, 4xmp40Wes, 2 x 6215 tunze waveboxes, 4 ghl mitras



360 Reef Tank
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-30-2010, 10:13 PM
lastlight's Avatar
lastlight lastlight is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 6,997
lastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura aboutlastlight has a spectacular aura about
Default

Oh yeah forgot to add that as well. Lol yeah that makes a nice mess too!
__________________
Brett
My 67 392 225 101 94 34 97 404 28 93 209 gallon reef.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.