|
|
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you use a Kalk/Ca reactor? | |||
| Yes Kalk |
   
|
3 | 15.00% |
| Yes Ca |
  
|
6 | 30.00% |
| No neither |
  
|
4 | 20.00% |
| Two part additives |
  
|
4 | 20.00% |
| One part like Kent Liquid reactor |
  
|
2 | 10.00% |
| Do you use Both? |
  
|
1 | 5.00% |
| Voters: 20. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
03-11-2003, 07:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Kalk vs Ca reactor
simple question, maybe.... if a Kalk reactor or Kalk addition can cause lowered Mg is a Ca reactor actually better, does the Ca reactor actually help add Mg to the water if I use a good quality aragonite?
|
|
#2
03-11-2003, 07:48 PM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I voted all ready but I found that kalk just couldnt keep up with my skimppy stocked reef in the beginning.. Also a reactor has been an absolute dream in terms of saving time. 8)
__________________
No matter what the morrow brings, inventors keep inventing things. ----------------------------------- Jonathan ----------------------------------- www.cakerybakery.ca
|
|
#3
03-12-2003, 02:35 AM
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
You may want to add one more option to that poll. There are those who use both. ie myself and Shao.
__________________
Darren Always strive for the optimum environment, not the minimum environment -----------------------------------
|
|
#4
03-12-2003, 03:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks DJ it has been added.
|
|
#6
03-12-2003, 03:52 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Darn picky people... just coulda voted twice... lol
|
Linear Mode
