Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2008, 02:46 PM
Rene
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sand or no sand?

Hi, I'm new to this saltwater thing and I have been getting some conflicting advise. So I thought I would ask all of you your opinions. Should I put sand in my new 225 reef tank, or should I leave it glass bottom? If sand, how much?

Thanks for the help!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2008, 03:22 PM
Whatigot Whatigot is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 680
Whatigot is on a distinguished road
Default

you might as well ask people which way they vote...
It's always an issue of contention, it should depend on your plans for filtration, maintenance and aesthetics.
Many people swear by the benefits of a deep sand bed while others vehemently hate them and the maintenance they can entail.

not very helpfull I know, but this is what I learned when I was asking this same question on this same forum
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2008, 03:41 PM
cheech cheech is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: montreal
Posts: 7
cheech is on a distinguished road
Default

I'd go sand, shallow bed, (1-2"), and keep your DSB for a seperate fuge.

Not that there's anything wrong with a sandless tank, I just think they don't look good!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2008, 03:47 PM
BMW Rider's Avatar
BMW Rider BMW Rider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 784
BMW Rider is on a distinguished road
Default

If you like how sand makes the tank look, then add sand. If you like the look of bare glass on the bottom, then don't add sand. Both methods have their strong and weak points for maintenance. True deep sand beds are problematic and little used anymore. Most sand beds are just for aesthectics or to provide realistic habitat for certain livestock such as pistol shrimp, gobies, jawfish etc.
__________________
I retired and got a fixed income but it's broke.

Ed
_______________________________________
50 gallon FOWLR, 10 gallon sump.
130 gallon reef, 20 gallon sump, 10 gallon refugium.
10 gallon quarantine.
60 gallon winter tank for pond fish.
300 gallon pond with waterfall.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2008, 03:52 PM
digital-audiophile's Avatar
digital-audiophile digital-audiophile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SE Calgary - DouglasGlen
Posts: 1,456
digital-audiophile is on a distinguished road
Default

I had really thought about going BB but decided in the end that I really like the way sand looks. As long as you have snails/crabs/sea stars/fish that clean your sandbed you can't go wrong.
__________________
- Greg

90G : Light - Tek 6xT5 | Skim - EuroReef RS135 | Flow - 2xVortech MP40W | Control - Reef Keeper 2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2008, 04:01 PM
Whatigot Whatigot is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 680
Whatigot is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheech View Post
I'd go sand, shallow bed, (1-2"), and keep your DSB for a seperate fuge.

Not that there's anything wrong with a sandless tank, I just think they don't look good!
why>?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2008, 04:09 PM
hillbillyreefer hillbillyreefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central, AB
Posts: 471
hillbillyreefer is on a distinguished road
Default

Try searching sand beds. That should keep you busy reading for the next day or two. There are more opinions on sand than just about any other subject out there.

I tried to make my new 33gal reef tank bare bottom, that lasted about 2 weeks. My wife and I both hated the look. Added some caribsea white sand and we both like the look. The first things into the tank after LR were sand sifting critters. Mostly nassarius snails, and a strawberry conch. It's been white and clean for a couple months. In the morning there are tracks everywhere through the sand, the little guys are busy at night.

The pros and cons of each are factors you need to take into account. In the end you will decide based on which look you like the best.

If you can't decide, start out BB if you don't like that add some sand. As for how much I don't want to stat that debate. I started out with a level 2" bed, now with current patterns it varies from 1/2" to close to 4" in some places.

HTH a little. Good luck with your research.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2008, 07:08 PM
Brent F's Avatar
Brent F Brent F is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 382
Brent F is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, there have been some long discussions on this. What I got from it is deep sand beds are nt recommended because we can't get the livestock required by them here.

Bare bottom is easier to maintain but go shallow sandbed if you prefer the look and are willing to do a little more maintenance.

I have three tanks. One bare bottom and two very shallow substrate.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2008, 07:15 PM
Whatigot Whatigot is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Coquitlam, B.C.
Posts: 680
Whatigot is on a distinguished road
Default

on that note, what exactly are the livestock we can't get that are required?
or did you mean only unavailable in alberta?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-28-2008, 07:43 PM
cheech cheech is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: montreal
Posts: 7
cheech is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatigot View Post
why>?
well, 6 inches of sand in the main tank, I feel, takes too much space and isn't as pleasing to the eye. And, I think there might be too much flow in the main tank.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.