I always thought water velocity and the shape of the water flow / cone / whatever was the more important thing to get right. I've always kind of thought the "must have moar turnover" school of thought was kind of silly in much the same way it was silly to speak in terms of "watts per gallon" 15 years ago when we talked about lighting.
Your plan seems more or less legit to me. FWIW.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
|