Side by side the crosstrek only seemed 2 or so inches shorter.
Ive got a little 50lb pitty and occasionallu have a 50lb husky.
No kids (never...) so the back seats would stay down to give them more room.
Plenty enough room in the back for my pitty with thr seats up. She always lies down while we drive. I could probably fit 4 of her in the back of a Trax with how small she curls up.
I just prefer the height of a smaller Suv over a traditional wagon. At least the crosstrek is inbeteeen.
That is why i wanted the forester at first until i took a closer look at the Trax.
Honestly would prefer the slight fuel economy difference between the forester and crosstrek vs the slight size difference.
Last edited by Coasting; 07-23-2014 at 01:44 AM.
|