View Single Post
  #5  
Old 03-13-2014, 01:30 PM
Babalouie Babalouie is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 8
Babalouie is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaHorse_Fanatic View Post
With what you want to keep long-term, I don't see any real advantage going with bigger tank. I have a 93g cube & LOVE it. Looks so much nicer IMO than a standard rectangular tank and yet takes up very little room. I use one pendant to light the whole thing (LEDs) whereas I would need twice as much lighting to do a 150g. Also, not a huge fan of 30" deep tanks, although seahorses supposedly like the extra depth for mating dances. When I used to keep seahorses (mostly Erectus & Kudas w/c) back in the day, I had them doing the dance in 33g tanks (18" tall) so the 24" height of the 93g cube should still be sufficient.

Also, the seahorses will LOVE your sexy shrimp (expensive snacks). My friend's Reidis used to eat 300-400 fw ghost shrimp a month and those are 10 times bigger than sexy shrimp. Serious incompatibility issue. Sexy shrimp are tiny and to really enjoy them best, set up a nano where their small size works to your advantage and is not a disadvantage. You could set up a ricordea/sexy shrimp tank to start and later build the bigger system and move some of the rics over. It will give you time to grow them out cause a tank full of rics is super expensive unless you live in the States and can get them wholesale or direct from the source.

Anthony
Thanks for the reply. I find the cube a bit more appealing as well. Glad to hear it will be suitable for the ricordea and the seahorses. Also, thanks for the heads up on the sexy shrimp. A smaller tank for them sounds like a good idea. I just have the notion in my head that smaller tanks in sw is a bad thing for stability issue, but I know that isn't always true. I just need to move past that.

Did you have your cube drilled or did you use another setup?
Reply With Quote