Quote:
Originally Posted by Coralgurl
Why does the hydro company have a right to do what they've done to your property and why was this not an in/out project? Someone is accountable for your damages unless this was all agreed upon. Even if you have an easement for a utility right of way, they should have had to either provided temporary fencing or resecured your property while they were on it.
There's got to be more to this. My SIL had the town they are in take part of their property for a residential development, they had to pay, fence and replant trees/shrubs that were removed, relocated or became part of the development and make them 100% whole again. They were also paid for this portion of the land, all legals and new rpr.
I wouldn't have let them step foot on my property without some sort of agreement to protect the property and family.
|
Unfortunately it is legislated whether on private property or not any tree/obstruction on a BC hydro right of way and 50 ft to either side hydro maintains all rights of removal of any trees/obstruction but are not required to clean up either. I had my own battle with them 4 yrs ago I live right beside a hydro right of way and had a tree removed as it was higher than the hydro lines but outside the 50 foot exclusion zone but hydro deemed it a danger to the lines so they told me it was coming down the contractor took down the tree and they took the bigger stuff but I was left to clean up the branches and stump.
As to the fence and dogs I feel that you have the expectation of recourse because they destroyed private property(fence) and caused unnessecary suffering to your animals.