View Single Post
  #53  
Old 05-05-2013, 08:49 PM
mkj mkj is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: north vancouver
Posts: 14
mkj is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

I'm on the landlords side, on regards to the tank. Landlord has 100s of thousands invested in any one property, and it's his property. If he doesn't want the risk of a largish tank, he has the right to not allow you to have one, even with insurance. It's nice of him to allow you to have a small one. I'm a home remodeler and I've seen a 30gallon tank do close to 100k in damage to a house. This was on a second floor and the tank broke and only the surface water was cleaned up. A few years later it was found that black mold had spread through the walls (A very bad thing). I've also read about tanks doing close to half a million in damages in apartment buildings because of a brake. In apartments the broken tanks water damage can affect multiple units bellow the said apartment. I'm a reef tank lover and a landlord. I would never allow a tenant to have anything larger thank a 10 gallon in my condos, even with insurance. Just because you have insurance doesn't mean the insurance company will pay. In most cases they will find a way to not pay. I own a 120 gallon reef myself, but its my property, I'm willing to take the risk, but I'm not willing to take a risk on my tenants. Murphy's law will bit a landlord if he take risks like that. I work way too hard for my money to allow a tenant to take it from me. I'm sure your landlord is a nice guy he just realizes the risks involved. Landlord have rights to.
Reply With Quote