Quote:
Originally Posted by Slick Fork
Which reputable sources? Some guy in his Mom's basement who refuses to publish his name or credentials has never struck me as a reputable source. I know better than to take the news at face value, there's always another side, but there are just as many holes in a lot of these conspiracy theories and quite frankly many of them just sound like the work of nutjobs. In the absence of compelling evidence to the contrary, I'm willing to take the US governments word that they killed him this weekend.
|
There has been many published books by reputable professors, one being Prof David Griffin, hardly some guy in a basement.
If you want to talk reputable sources the only actual evidence provided by the US government even linking OBL to 911 is their so called confession tape which was released exactly when Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair had failed to prove Bin Laden's responsibility for 911 and both men were trying to win international public support, particularly in the Islamic world, for the anti-terrorist campaign. Then look at the tape, he is a weighty man with a black beard, not a grey one. His pale skin had suddenly become darker, and he had a different shaped nose. His artistic hands with slender fingers had transformed into those of a pugilist. Furthermore, Bin Laden can be seen writing a note with his right hand, although he is left-handed. Then consider some of his comments about how he knew the iron structure of the twin towers would melt yet he was actually a civil engineer in a passed life and would know the towers were constructed from steel not iron and a hydrocarbon fire from jet fuel can only reach 1800F while steel melts at 2800F.